BACKGROUND: DNA hypomethylation has been suggested to cause genomic instability and increase cancer risk. We aimed to test the hypothesis that DNA hypomethylation is associated with increased risk of bladder cancer. METHODS: We measured cytosine methylation (5-mC) content in genomic DNA from blood cells from patients with bladder cancer enrolled in a large case-control study in Spain between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2001. Cases were men and women with newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Controls were selected from patients admitted to the same hospital for diseases or conditions unrelated to smoking or other known risk factors for bladder cancer. Controls were individually matched to cases on age (within 5 years), sex, race, and area of hospital referral. 5-mC content was measured in leucocyte DNA by use of a combination of high-performance capillary electrophoresis, Hpa II digestion, and densitometry. Data on demographics, 34 polymorphisms in nine folate metabolism genes, and nutritional intake of six B vitamins (including folate), alcohol, and smoking were assessed as potential confounders. Relative 5-mC content was expressed as a percentage (%5-mC) with respect to the total cytosine content (the sum of methylated and non-methylated cytosines). The primary endpoint was median %5-mC DNA content. FINDINGS: %5-mC was measured in leucocyte DNA from 775 cases and 397 controls. Median %5-mC DNA was significantly lower in cases (3.03% [IQR 2.17-3.56]) than in controls (3.19% [2.46-3.68], p=0.0002). All participants were subsequently categorised into quartiles by %5-mC content in controls. When the highest quartile of %5-mC content was used as the reference category (Q4), the following adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were recorded for decreasing methylation quartiles: OR(Q3) 2.05 (95% CI 1.37-3.06); OR(Q2) 1.62 (1.07-2.44); and OR(Q1) 2.67 (1.77-4.03), p for trend <0.0001. The lowest cancer risk was noted in never smokers in the highest methylation quartile (never smokers in Q4). By comparison with never smokers in the highest quartile, current smokers in the lowest methylation quartile had the highest risk of bladder cancer (Q1: OR 25.51 [9.61-67.76], p for interaction 0.06). In analyses stratified by smoking, hypomethylation was a strong risk factor in never smokers (OR 6.39 [2.37-17.22]). Amount of methylation in controls were not associated with baseline characteristics, micronutrients, or selected genotypes in folate metabolism pathways. INTERPRETATION: For the first time, to our knowledge, we have shown in a large case-control study that leucocyte DNA hypomethylation is associated with increased risk of developing bladder cancer, and this association is independent of smoking and the other assessed risk factors. Amount of global methylation in genomic DNA could provide a useful biomarker of susceptibility to certain cancer types and further research is warranted.
BACKGROUND: DNA hypomethylation has been suggested to cause genomic instability and increase cancer risk. We aimed to test the hypothesis that DNA hypomethylation is associated with increased risk of bladder cancer. METHODS: We measured cytosine methylation (5-mC) content in genomic DNA from blood cells from patients with bladder cancer enrolled in a large case-control study in Spain between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2001. Cases were men and women with newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Controls were selected from patients admitted to the same hospital for diseases or conditions unrelated to smoking or other known risk factors for bladder cancer. Controls were individually matched to cases on age (within 5 years), sex, race, and area of hospital referral. 5-mC content was measured in leucocyte DNA by use of a combination of high-performance capillary electrophoresis, Hpa II digestion, and densitometry. Data on demographics, 34 polymorphisms in nine folate metabolism genes, and nutritional intake of six B vitamins (including folate), alcohol, and smoking were assessed as potential confounders. Relative 5-mC content was expressed as a percentage (%5-mC) with respect to the total cytosine content (the sum of methylated and non-methylated cytosines). The primary endpoint was median %5-mC DNA content. FINDINGS: %5-mC was measured in leucocyte DNA from 775 cases and 397 controls. Median %5-mC DNA was significantly lower in cases (3.03% [IQR 2.17-3.56]) than in controls (3.19% [2.46-3.68], p=0.0002). All participants were subsequently categorised into quartiles by %5-mC content in controls. When the highest quartile of %5-mC content was used as the reference category (Q4), the following adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were recorded for decreasing methylation quartiles: OR(Q3) 2.05 (95% CI 1.37-3.06); OR(Q2) 1.62 (1.07-2.44); and OR(Q1) 2.67 (1.77-4.03), p for trend <0.0001. The lowest cancer risk was noted in never smokers in the highest methylation quartile (never smokers in Q4). By comparison with never smokers in the highest quartile, current smokers in the lowest methylation quartile had the highest risk of bladder cancer (Q1: OR 25.51 [9.61-67.76], p for interaction 0.06). In analyses stratified by smoking, hypomethylation was a strong risk factor in never smokers (OR 6.39 [2.37-17.22]). Amount of methylation in controls were not associated with baseline characteristics, micronutrients, or selected genotypes in folate metabolism pathways. INTERPRETATION: For the first time, to our knowledge, we have shown in a large case-control study that leucocyte DNA hypomethylation is associated with increased risk of developing bladder cancer, and this association is independent of smoking and the other assessed risk factors. Amount of global methylation in genomic DNA could provide a useful biomarker of susceptibility to certain cancer types and further research is warranted.
Authors: Arndt Hartmann; Livia Zanardo; Tina Bocker-Edmonston; Hagen Blaszyk; Wolfgang Dietmaier; Robert Stoehr; John C Cheville; Kerstin Junker; Wolf Wieland; Ruth Knuechel; Josef Rueschoff; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Richard Fishel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mario F Fraga; Esther Uriol; L Borja Diego; María Berdasco; Manel Esteller; María Jesús Cañal; Roberto Rodríguez Journal: Electrophoresis Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: K Kawamura; M Moriyama; N Shiba; M Ozaki; T Tanaka; T Nojima; K Fujikawa-Yamamoto; R Ikeda; K Suzuki Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ina Rhee; Kurtis E Bachman; Ben Ho Park; Kam-Wing Jair; Ray-Whay Chiu Yen; Kornel E Schuebel; Hengmi Cui; Andrew P Feinberg; Christoph Lengauer; Kenneth W Kinzler; Stephen B Baylin; Bert Vogelstein Journal: Nature Date: 2002-04-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Feng Jiang; Nancy P Caraway; Anita L Sabichi; Hua Z Zhang; Arnout Ruitrok; H Barton Grossman; Jun Gu; Seth P Lerner; Scott Lippman; Ruth L Katz Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2003-09-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Lee E Moore; Allan H Smith; Clarence Eng; David Kalman; Sandy DeVries; Vivek Bhargava; Karen Chew; Dan Moore; Catterina Ferreccio; Omar A Rey; Frederic M Waldman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-11-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Xifeng Wu; Christopher I Amos; Yong Zhu; Hua Zhao; Barton H Grossman; Jerry W Shay; Sherry Luo; Waun Ki Hong; Margaret R Spitz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Hui-Chen Wu; Qiao Wang; Lissette Delgado-Cruzata; Regina M Santella; Mary Beth Terry Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Patrick F Chinnery; Hannah R Elliott; Gavin Hudson; David C Samuels; Caroline L Relton Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Zhong-Zheng Zhu; Lifang Hou; Valentina Bollati; Letizia Tarantini; Barbara Marinelli; Laura Cantone; Allen S Yang; Pantel Vokonas; Jolanta Lissowska; Silvia Fustinoni; Angela C Pesatori; Matteo Bonzini; Pietro Apostoli; Giovanni Costa; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Wong-Ho Chow; Joel Schwartz; Andrea Baccarelli Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Charlotte S Wilhelm; Karl T Kelsey; Rondi Butler; Silvia Plaza; Luc Gagne; M Scot Zens; Angeline S Andrew; Steven Morris; Heather H Nelson; Alan R Schned; Margaret R Karagas; Carmen J Marsit Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Zhong-Zheng Zhu; David Sparrow; Lifang Hou; Letizia Tarantini; Valentina Bollati; Augusto A Litonjua; Antonella Zanobetti; Pantel Vokonas; Robert O Wright; Andrea Baccarelli; Joel Schwartz Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-12-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Dana van Bemmel; Petra Lenz; Linda M Liao; Dalsu Baris; Lawrence R Sternberg; Andrew Warner; Alison Johnson; Michael Jones; Masatoshi Kida; Molly Schwenn; Alan R Schned; Debra T Silverman; Nathaniel Rothman; Lee E Moore Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Paula L Hyland; Laura S Burke; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Lisa Mirabello; Margaret A Tucker; Alisa M Goldstein; Xiaohong R Yang Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.599