Literature DB >> 33106971

Centrosome amplification: a quantifiable cancer cell trait with prognostic value in solid malignancies.

Karuna Mittal1, Jaspreet Kaur1, Meghan Jaczko1, Guanhao Wei1, Michael S Toss2, Emad A Rakha2, Emiel Adrianus Maria Janssen3, Håvard Søiland4, Omer Kucuk5, Michelle Dian Reid6, Meenakshi V Gupta7, Ritu Aneja8.   

Abstract

Numerical and/or structural centrosome amplification (CA) is a hallmark of cancers that is often associated with the aberrant tumor karyotypes and poor clinical outcomes. Mechanistically, CA compromises mitotic fidelity and leads to chromosome instability (CIN), which underlies tumor initiation and progression. Recent technological advances in microscopy and image analysis platforms have enabled better-than-ever detection and quantification of centrosomal aberrancies in cancer. Numerous studies have thenceforth correlated the presence and the degree of CA with indicators of poor prognosis such as higher tumor grade and ability to recur and metastasize. We have pioneered a novel semi-automated pipeline that integrates immunofluorescence confocal microscopy with digital image analysis to yield a quantitative centrosome amplification score (CAS), which is a summation of the severity and frequency of structural and numerical centrosome aberrations in tumor samples. Recent studies in breast cancer show that CA increases across the disease progression continuum, while normal breast tissue exhibited the lowest CA, followed by cancer-adjacent apparently normal, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive tumors, which showed the highest CA. This finding strengthens the notion that CA could be evolutionarily favored and can promote tumor progression and metastasis. In this review, we discuss the prevalence, extent, and severity of CA in various solid cancer types, the utility of quantifying amplified centrosomes as an independent prognostic marker. We also highlight the clinical feasibility of a CA-based risk score for predicting recurrence, metastasis, and overall prognosis in patients with solid cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centrosome amplification; DCIS; Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections; Prognostic biomarker; Solid tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33106971      PMCID: PMC7897259          DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09937-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  165 in total

1.  Requirement of a centrosomal activity for cell cycle progression through G1 into S phase.

Authors:  E H Hinchcliffe; F J Miller; M Cham; A Khodjakov; G Sluder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The discovery of meiosis by E. Van Beneden, a breakthrough in the morphological phase of heredity.

Authors:  G Hamoir
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.203

Review 3.  Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis.

Authors:  M Kirschner; T Mitchison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-05-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Centrosome hyperamplification and chromosomal instability in bladder cancer.

Authors:  K Kawamura; M Moriyama; N Shiba; M Ozaki; T Tanaka; T Nojima; K Fujikawa-Yamamoto; R Ikeda; K Suzuki
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors.

Authors:  G A Pihan; A Purohit; J Wallace; H Knecht; B Woda; P Quesenberry; S J Doxsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Centrosome aberrations in chronic myeloid leukemia correlate with stage of disease and chromosomal instability.

Authors:  M Giehl; A Fabarius; O Frank; A Hochhaus; M Hafner; R Hehlmann; W Seifarth
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Association of loss of BRCA1 expression with centrosome aberration in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Shimomura; Yasuo Miyoshi; Tetsuya Taguchi; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Pericentrin, a highly conserved centrosome protein involved in microtubule organization.

Authors:  S J Doxsey; P Stein; L Evans; P D Calarco; M Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Centrosomes: Sfi1p and centrin unravel a structural riddle.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-01-06       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Centrosome amplification induces high grade features and is prognostic of worse outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan A Denu; Lauren M Zasadil; Craig Kanugh; Jennifer Laffin; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  POC1A, prognostic biomarker of immunosuppressive microenvironment in cancer.

Authors:  Qi Zhao; Shuping Gao; Xin Chen; Xiyan Zhu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.955

2.  Brucea javanica Oil Emulsion Promotes Autophagy in Ovarian Cancer Cells Through the miR-8485/LAMTOR3/mTOR/ATG13 Signaling Axis.

Authors:  Yihan Wang; Bocen Chen; Man Xiao; Xiaoli Wang; Yunhua Peng
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Daughter centrioles assemble preferentially towards the nuclear envelope in Drosophila syncytial embryos.

Authors:  Neil H J Cunningham; Imène B Bouhlel; Paul T Conduit
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.