Literature DB >> 16671749

Electrostatics of ligand binding: parametrization of the generalized Born model and comparison with the Poisson-Boltzmann approach.

Hao-Yang Liu1, Xiaoqin Zou.   

Abstract

An accurate and fast evaluation of the electrostatics in ligand-protein interactions is crucial for computer-aided drug design. The pairwise generalized Born (GB) model, a fast analytical method originally developed for studying the solvation of organic molecules, has been widely applied to macromolecular systems, including ligand-protein complexes. However, this model involves several empirical scaling parameters, which have been optimized for the solvation of organic molecules, peptides, and nucleic acids but not for energetics of ligand binding. Studies have shown that a good solvation energy does not guarantee a correct model of solvent-mediated interactions. Thus, in this study, we have used the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) approach as a reference to optimize the GB model for studies of ligand-protein interactions. Specifically, we have employed the pairwise descreening approximation proposed by Hawkins et al.(1) for GB calculations and DelPhi for PB calculations. The AMBER all-atom force field parameters have been used in this work. Seventeen protein-ligand complexes have been used as a training database, and a set of atomic descreening parameters has been selected with which the pairwise GB model and the PB model yield comparable results on atomic Born radii, the electrostatic component of free energies of ligand binding, and desolvation energies of the ligands and proteins. The energetics of the 15 test complexes calculated with the GB model using this set of parameters also agrees well with the energetics calculated with the PB method. This is the first time that the GB model has been parametrized and thoroughly compared with the PB model for the electrostatics of ligand binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16671749      PMCID: PMC2716126          DOI: 10.1021/jp060334w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  28 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Macromolecular electrostatics: continuum models and their growing pains.

Authors:  T Simonson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Automated docking of highly flexible ligands by genetic algorithms: a critical assessment.

Authors:  Marco Cecchini; Peter Kolb; Nicolas Majeux; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect.

Authors:  Alexey Onufriev; David A Case; Donald Bashford
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

7.  The MPSim-Dock hierarchical docking algorithm: application to the eight trypsin inhibitor cocrystals.

Authors:  Art E Cho; John A Wendel; Nagarajan Vaidehi; Peter M Kekenes-Huskey; Wely B Floriano; Prabal K Maiti; William A Goddard
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 9.  Computational approaches to molecular recognition.

Authors:  M L Lamb; W L Jorgensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Discovery of cell-permeable non-peptide inhibitors of beta-secretase by high-throughput docking and continuum electrostatics calculations.

Authors:  Danzhi Huang; Urs Lüthi; Peter Kolb; Karin Edler; Marco Cecchini; Stephan Audetat; Alcide Barberis; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  19 in total

1.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Jianhan Chen; Charles L Brooks; Jana Khandogin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Electrostatic free energy landscapes for DNA helix bending.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  On the role of electrostatics in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Shawn Witham; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Prediction of the three-dimensional structure for the rat urotensin II receptor, and comparison of the antagonist binding sites and binding selectivity between human and rat receptors from atomistic simulations.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; Youyong Li; Changmoon Park; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Competitive Binding of Mg2+ and Na+ Ions to Nucleic Acids: From Helices to Tertiary Structures.

Authors:  Kun Xi; Feng-Hua Wang; Gui Xiong; Zhong-Liang Zhang; Zhi-Jie Tan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

9.  RLDOCK: A New Method for Predicting RNA-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Li-Zhen Sun; Yangwei Jiang; Yuanzhe Zhou; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Multiscale generalized born modeling of ligand binding energies for virtual database screening.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Liu; Sam Z Grinter; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.