Literature DB >> 12214312

Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect.

Alexey Onufriev1, David A Case, Donald Bashford.   

Abstract

Generalized Born (GB) models provide, for many applications, an accurate and computationally facile estimate of the electrostatic contribution to aqueous solvation. The GB models involve two main types of approximations relative to the Poisson equation (PE) theory on which they are based. First, the self-energy contributions of individual atoms are estimated and expressed as "effective Born radii." Next, the atom-pair contributions are estimated by an analytical function f(GB) that depends upon the effective Born radii and interatomic distance of the atom pairs. Here, the relative impacts of these approximations are investigated by calculating "perfect" effective Born radii from PE theory, and enquiring as to how well the atom-pairwise energy terms from a GB model using these perfect radii in the standard f(GB) function duplicate the equivalent terms from PE theory. In tests on several biological macromolecules, the use of these perfect radii greatly increases the accuracy of the atom-pair terms; that is, the standard form of f(GB) performs quite well. The remaining small error has a systematic and a random component. The latter cannot be removed without significantly increasing the complexity of the GB model, but an alternative choice of f(GB) can reduce the systematic part. A molecular dynamics simulation using a perfect-radii GB model compares favorably with simulations using conventional GB, even though the radii remain fixed in the former. These results quantify, for the GB field, the importance of getting the effective Born radii right; indeed, with perfect radii, the GB model gives a very good approximation to the underlying PE theory for a variety of biomacromolecular types and conformations. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12214312     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  116 in total

1.  Differential geometry based solvation model II: Lagrangian formulation.

Authors:  Zhan Chen; Nathan A Baker; G W Wei
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Insights into nucleic acid conformational dynamics from massively parallel stochastic simulations.

Authors:  Eric J Sorin; Young Min Rhee; Bradley J Nakatani; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models.

Authors:  Alfonso Jaramillo; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Energy functions for protein design I: efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Simulation of the folding equilibrium of alpha-helical peptides: a comparison of the generalized Born approximation with explicit solvent.

Authors:  Hugh Nymeyer; Angel E García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evaluation of DNA Force Fields in Implicit Solvation.

Authors:  Thomas Gaillard; David A Case
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Predicting nonspecific ion binding using DelPhi.

Authors:  Marharyta Petukh; Maxim Zhenirovskyy; Chuan Li; Lin Li; Lin Wang; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Generalized Born model with a simple, robust molecular volume correction.

Authors:  John Mongan; Carlos Simmerling; J Andrew McCammon; David A Case; Alexey Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Nucleotide docking: prediction of reactant state complexes for ribonuclease enzymes.

Authors:  Brigitta Elsässer; Gregor Fels
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Long Timestep Molecular Dynamics on the Graphical Processing Unit.

Authors:  James C Sweet; Ronald J Nowling; Trevor Cickovski; Christopher R Sweet; Vijay S Pande; Jesús A Izaguirre
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.