Literature DB >> 16651971

Calvarial thickness and its relation to cranial bone harvest.

Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez1, Francis E Papay, James E Zins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to define the variability in skull thickness from location to location and from individual to individual in a large number of human skulls.
METHOD: Skull thickness was measured in multiple areas of the calvaria in 281 dry skulls from the Hamman-Todd osteological collection (Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio). A total of 40 points were determined over the frontal, occipital, and parietal bones, with a higher number of points concentrated on the latter. Repeated measures analysis of variance models were used to assess the effects of covariates (individual variables) on skull thickness and location. RESULT: A statistically significant pattern of increased thickness toward the posterior parietal bones was seen in all subgroups. The mean thickness of the skull across all locations was 6.32 mm (SEM, 0.07 mm) and ranged from 5.3 mm (SEM, 0.09 mm) to 7.5 mm (SEM, 0.09 mm). Age was not found to be a significant predictor of mean skull thickness. Differences between male and female skulls were greater toward the rear of the parietal bones.
CONCLUSION: The thickest area of the skull is the parasagittal posterior parietal area in male skulls and the posterior parietal area midway between the sagittal and superior temporal line in female skulls. An accurate map of the skull thickness representing the normative data of the studied population was developed. It is hoped that this topographic map will assist the surgeons in choosing the safest area of cranial bone graft harvest, thus increasing the safety of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16651971     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000209933.78532.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  19 in total

1.  Impact of prone, supine and oblique patient positioning on CBCT image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit value in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Maureen van Eijnatten; Jorma Järnstedt; Kirsi Holli-Helenius; Prasun Dastidar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Topological optimization for designing patient-specific large craniofacial segmental bone replacements.

Authors:  Alok Sutradhar; Glaucio H Paulino; Michael J Miller; Tam H Nguyen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Non-invasive examination of a skull fragment recovered from a World War Two aircraft crash site.

Authors:  René Gapert; Kurt Rieder
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  The thickness of parietal bones in a new zealand sample of cadaveric skulls in relation to calvarial bone graft.

Authors:  Han J Choi; Rohana K De Silva; Darryl C Tong; Harsha L De Silva; Robert M Love; Josie Athens
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-05-09

5.  Quantitative assessment of diffuse optical tomography sensitivity to the cerebral cortex using a whole-head probe.

Authors:  Katherine L Perdue; Qianqian Fang; Solomon G Diamond
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Average thickness of the bones of the human neurocranium: development of reference measurements to assist with blunt force trauma interpretations.

Authors:  Samantha K Rowbotham; Calvin G Mole; Diana Tieppo; Magda Blaszkowska; Stephen M Cordner; Soren Blau
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  The dynamic impact behavior of the human neurocranium.

Authors:  Johann Zwirner; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Joshua Workman; Ashvin Thambyah; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Nonmissile penetrating head injury with a wooden table leg: An illustrative case.

Authors:  Megan M Finneran; Dario A Marotta; Emilio M Nardone
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Effects of Increasing Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Current Intensity on Cortical Sensorimotor Network Activation: A Time Domain fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Makii Muthalib; Rebecca Re; Lucia Zucchelli; Stephane Perrey; Davide Contini; Matteo Caffini; Lorenzo Spinelli; Graham Kerr; Valentina Quaresima; Marco Ferrari; Alessandro Torricelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intraosseous venous malformation of the zygoma: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Toshie Matsumiya; Hitoshi Nemoto; Yoshiaki Kasai; Naoki Maruyama; Noriyoshi Sumiya
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.