Literature DB >> 24436746

The thickness of parietal bones in a new zealand sample of cadaveric skulls in relation to calvarial bone graft.

Han J Choi1, Rohana K De Silva1, Darryl C Tong1, Harsha L De Silva1, Robert M Love1, Josie Athens2.   

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the average thickness of the parietal bones in their different regions to identify the ideal site(s) for calvarial bone graft harvest. Methods and Materials Thickness of the parietal bones of 25 wet cranial vaults of New Zealand European origin was measured in 135 different locations using an electronic caliper. Analyses to identify the ideal harvest sites were conducted so that the sites fit the features of an ideal harvest site described in the literature as: (1) 6 mm of minimum thickness and (2) 2 cm away from the midline. Results and Conclusion The overall average thickness was 6.69 ± 0.22 mm. The average thickness at different sites within the same bone ranged from 2.85 to 6.93 mm. In keeping with previous studies, the report observed a progressive thickening of the parietal bone in medial and posterior directions. Of the 135 different locations measured, only 20% exceeded an average thickness of 6 mm as well as being 2 cm away from the sagittal midline. These locations were mainly located between 6 to 11 cm posterior to the coronal suture and 2 to 5 cm away from the sagittal suture. Conclusion Harvesting the calvarial bone graft in the area 6 to 11 cm posterior to the coronal suture and 2 cm away from the midline is recommended based on our study using cadaveric cranial vaults of New Zealand Europeans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calvarial graft; bone graft; graft harvest; reconstruction

Year:  2013        PMID: 24436746      PMCID: PMC3721012          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  18 in total

1.  Regional thickness of parietal bone in Korean adults.

Authors:  Y-S Jung; H-J Kim; S-W Choi; J-W Kang; I-H Cha
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Management of naso-orbital-ethmoidal fractures.

Authors:  Harry Papadopoulos; Nader K Salib
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Ultrasound in the assessment of cranial bone thickness.

Authors:  M M Elahi; M L Lessard; S Hakim; K Watkin; J Sampalis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium for facial and cranial applications.

Authors:  P Tessier
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  The split calvarial graft donor site in the elderly: a study in cadavers.

Authors:  W G Sullivan; A A Smith
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Cranial bone grafting in children.

Authors:  W J Koenig; J M Donovan; J M Pensler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Matteo Chiapasco; Paolo Casentini; Marco Zaniboni
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years.

Authors:  Erik Neovius; Thomas Engstrand
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin.

Authors:  R A Hardesty; J L Marsh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  A comparison of iliac and cranial bone in secondary grafting of alveolar clefts.

Authors:  D LaRossa; S Buchman; D M Rothkopf; R Mayro; P Randall
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; David Fürst; Peter Augat; Falk Schrödl; Benjamin Esterer; Stefan Gabauer; Stefan Hunger; Michael Malek; Daniel Stephan; Andreas Schrempf
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Cranial Implants for Virtual Surgical Planning: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Bilal Msallem; Michaela Maintz; Florian S Halbeisen; Simon Meyer; Guido R Sigron; Neha Sharma; Shuaishuai Cao; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.