Literature DB >> 35486199

Average thickness of the bones of the human neurocranium: development of reference measurements to assist with blunt force trauma interpretations.

Samantha K Rowbotham1,2, Calvin G Mole3, Diana Tieppo4, Magda Blaszkowska5, Stephen M Cordner6,4, Soren Blau6,4.   

Abstract

The accurate interpretation of a blunt force head injury relies on an understanding of the case circumstances (extrinsic variables) and anatomical details of the individual (intrinsic variables). Whilst it is often possible to account for many of these variables, the intrinsic variable of neurocranial thickness is difficult to account for as data for what constitutes 'normal' thickness is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of age, sex and ancestry on neurocranial thickness, and develop reference ranges for average neurocranial thickness in the context of those biological variables. Thickness (mm) was measured at 20 points across the frontal, left and right parietals, left and right temporals and occipital bones. Measurements were taken from post-mortem computed tomography scans of 604 individuals. Inferential statistics assessed how age, sex and ancestry affected thickness and descriptive statistics established thickness means. Mean thickness ranged from 2.11 mm (temporal squama) to 19.19 mm (petrous portion). Significant differences were noted in thickness of the frontal and temporal bones when age was considered, all bones when sex was considered and the, right parietal, left and right temporal and occipital bones when ancestry was considered. Furthermore, significant interactions in thickness were seen between age and sex in the frontal bone, ancestry and age in the temporal bone, ancestry and sex in the temporal bone, and age, sex and ancestry in the occipital bone. Given the assorted influence of the biological variables, reference measurement ranges for average thickness incorporated these variables. Such reference measurements allow forensic practitioners to identify when a neurocranial bone is of normal, or abnormal, thickness.
© 2022. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological profile; Blunt force trauma; Neurocranial fracture; Neurocranial thickness

Year:  2022        PMID: 35486199     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02824-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  37 in total

1.  Thickness of the normal skull in the American Blacks and Whites.

Authors:  A Adeloye; K R Kattan; F N Silverman
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Increase in cranial thickness during growth.

Authors:  A F ROCHE
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1953-05       Impact factor: 0.553

3.  Cranial thickness of modern and neolithic populations in Japan.

Authors:  H Ishida; Y Dodo
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  Investigation of the force associated with the formation of lacerations and skull fractures.

Authors:  E J Sharkey; M Cassidy; J Brady; M D Gilchrist; N NicDaeid
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Skull thickness of Black and White races.

Authors:  M D Ross; K A Lee; W M Castle
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1976-04-10

6.  Age, sex and body mass index in relation to calvarial diploe thickness and craniometric data on MRI.

Authors:  Hatice Gul Hatipoglu; Hatice Nursun Ozcan; Ummuhan Sevgi Hatipoglu; Enis Yuksel
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Ontogenetic changes in cranial vault thickness in a modern sample of Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Marisol Anzelmo; Fernando Ventrice; Jimena Barbeito-Andrés; Héctor M Pucciarelli; Marina L Sardi
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Thickness of the human cranial diploe in relation to age, sex and general body build.

Authors:  Niels Lynnerup; Jacob G Astrup; Birgitte Sejrsen
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Human cranial vault thickness in a contemporary sample of 1097 autopsy cases: relation to body weight, stature, age, sex and ancestry.

Authors:  H H Hans De Boer; A E Lida Van der Merwe; V Vidija Soerdjbalie-Maikoe
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Two-Tiered Ambulance Dispatch and Redeployment considering Patient Severity Classification Errors.

Authors:  Seong Hyeon Park; Young Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.