Literature DB >> 16649074

Dedicated calibration formulas permit correction of differences between measurements by different IVUS devices as demonstrated in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries in vitro.

Marc Hartmann1, Clemens von Birgelen, Gary S Mintz, Nadine Deppermann, Olaf Dirsch, Martin G Stoel, Gert K van Houwelingen, Hans W Louwerenburg, Patrick M J Verhorst, Raimund Erbel.   

Abstract

Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements of coronary vessel dimensions are major endpoints of studies focusing on pharmacological interventions, efficiency of drug eluting stents, and vascular remodeling. In serial studies measurement variability among different IVUS devices may cause substantial misinterpretation and error. We analyzed 33 human coronary plaques in vitro using two different IVUS systems (mechanical IVUS system with a 40 MHz Atlantis SR catheter; solid-state electronic IVUS system with a 20 MHz Invision catheter) and repeatedly measured the total vessel, lumen, and plaque + media cross-sectional area and plaque burden (plaque + media area divided by total vessel area). Between the "raw" measurements made by the two devices, there was a significant difference for both plaque + media area (2.35+/-1.86 mm(2), P < 0.01) and plaque burden (5.39+/-3.68%, P < 0.05). Measurements were then corrected by use of recently introduced calibration formulas; as a result the differences decreased significantly for all IVUS parameters measured ( P < 0.0001). After correction, the remaining differences between the corrected mechanical and solid-state IVUS measurements similar to differences between repeated measurements with the same IVUS device (i.e., the intraobserver variability). Thus, in serial studies the use of different IVUS devices at index and follow-up procedure may introduce a substantial error as a result of system-related differences. The application of dedicated calibration formulas allows for correction for these differences by decreasing such differences to the level of intraobserver variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16649074     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-006-9092-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Influence of catheter position and equipment-related factors on the accuracy of intravascular ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  R Bekeredjian; S Hardt; A Just; A Hansen; H Kuecherer
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.022

3.  Simpson's rule for the volumetric ultrasound assessment of atherosclerotic coronary arteries: a study with ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; P J de Feyter; E A de Vrey; W Li; N Bruining; A Nicosia; J R Roelandt; P W Serruys
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.439

4.  In vitro and in vivo intravascular ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  A L Bartorelli; R F Neville; G Keren; B N Potkin; Y Almagor; R F Bonner; J M Gessert; M B Leon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Variability of a three-layered appearance in intravascular ultrasound coronary images: a comparison of morphometric measurements with four intravascular ultrasound systems.

Authors:  T Hiro; C Y Leung; R J Russo; H Karimi; A R Farvid; J M Tobis
Journal:  Am J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-10

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  B N Potkin; A L Bartorelli; J M Gessert; R F Neville; Y Almagor; W C Roberts; M B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Coronary atherosclerotic disease burden: an emerging endpoint in progression/regression studies using intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord       Date:  2003-09

9.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Relationship between cardiovascular risk as predicted by established risk scores versus plaque progression as measured by serial intravascular ultrasound in left main coronary arteries.

Authors:  Clemens von Birgelen; Marc Hartmann; Gary S Mintz; K Gert van Houwelingen; Nadine Deppermann; Axel Schmermund; Dirk Böse; Holger Eggebrecht; Till Neumann; Mario Gössl; Heinrich Wieneke; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  4 in total

1.  Atherosclerosis imaging with intravascular ultrasound. Validating acquisition and measurement tools to assure meaningful results.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Impact of analyzing less image frames per segment for radiofrequency-based volumetric intravascular ultrasound measurements in mild-to-moderate coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Huisman; Marc Hartmann; Eline S K Mattern; Gary S Mintz; Mounir W Z Basalus; Gert K van Houwelingen; Patrick M J Verhorst; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Reproducibility of volumetric intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency-based analysis of coronary plaque composition in vivo.

Authors:  Marc Hartmann; Eline S K Mattern; Jennifer Huisman; Gert K van Houwelingen; Frits H A F de Man; Martin G Stoel; Peter W Danse; Hans W Louwerenburg; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Comparison of quantitative measurements between two different intravascular ultrasound catheters and consoles: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okura; Makoto Watanabe; Akihiro Miura; Muneo Kurokawa; Tomoya Ueda; Tsunenari Soeda; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-02-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.