Literature DB >> 16645861

Compound subretinal prostheses with extra-ocular parts designed for human trials: successful long-term implantation in pigs.

Florian Gekeler1, Peter Szurman, Salvatore Grisanti, Ulrike Weiler, Rolf Claus, Tim-Oliver Greiner, Michael Völker, Konrad Kohler, Eberhart Zrenner, Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subretinal implants aim to replace photoreceptor function in patients suffering from degenerative retinal disease like retinitis pigmentosa by topically applying electrical stimuli in the subretinal space. This study-as a last step before upcoming human trials-explored a newly developed surgical technique for permanent implantation of complex subretinal implants with extra-ocular parts.
METHODS: The implant consisted of a microphoto-diode array (MPDA) with 1550 electrodes and a 4x4 array of gold electrodes for direct electrical stimulation; both were mounted onto a polyimide foil for transscleral placement into the subretinal space. The foil carried connection lanes to a silicone cable that was implanted under the skin and led to a stimulator box in the animal's neck. Surgery was performed in 11 domestic pigs. Improved vitreo-retinal surgical technique consisted of a 180 degrees peripheral retinotomy and use of diathermy to penetrate the choroid in order to avoid choroidal haemorrhage. Subretinal forceps were used to place the implant safely onto the retinal pigment epithelium before the retina was flattened, peripheral laser photocoagulation was applied and the eye was filled with silicon oil. The implant was stabilized by a scleral fixation patch, use of a metal clamp with bone screws on the animal's skull and a tissue ring under the animal's skin in the neck. Behaviour was observed in the freely moving animals after direct subretinal electrical stimulation and funduscopy, optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography and histology were performed.
RESULTS: All implants were successfully placed subretinally. In three animals a proliferative vitreo-retinopathy was observed after approximately 2 weeks. Otherwise, funduscopy and OCT demonstrated complete retinal attachment and FA showed no retinal vascular abnormalities over and around the implant. The animals showed clear behavioural reactions to electrical stimulation over the whole examination period. Histological examination failed to show any voltage-induced alteration in the cellular architecture of the retina overlying the stimulation electrodes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a new surgical procedure for highly safe and controlled implantation of complex subretinal devices with extra-ocular parts. The new implant design proved to be safely implantable in free-moving pigs for an observation period of 4 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16645861     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0339-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  28 in total

1.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina.

Authors:  A Stett; W Barth; S Weiss; H Haemmerle; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  [Physiological functional evaluation of retinal implants in animal models].

Authors:  R Eckhorn; A Stett; T Schanze; F Gekeler; H Schwahn; E Zrenner; M Wilms; M Eger; L Hesse
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Localized chemical release from an artificial synapse chip.

Authors:  Mark C Peterman; Jaan Noolandi; Mark S Blumenkranz; Harvey A Fishman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Subretinally transplanted embryonic stem cells rescue photoreceptor cells from degeneration in the RCS rats.

Authors:  U Schraermeyer; G Thumann; T Luther; N Kociok; S Armhold; K Kruttwig; C Andressen; K Addicks; K U Bartz-Schmidt
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Restoration of photoreceptor ultrastructure and function in retinal degeneration slow mice by gene therapy.

Authors:  R R Ali; G M Sarra; C Stephens; M D Alwis; J W Bainbridge; P M Munro; S Fauser; M B Reichel; C Kinnon; D M Hunt; S S Bhattacharya; A J Thrasher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Implantation and testing of subretinal film electrodes in domestic pigs.

Authors:  Thomas Schanze; Helmut G Sachs; Christoph Wiesenack; Ursula Brunner; Heiko Sailer
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Transscleral implantation and neurophysiological testing of subretinal polyimide film electrodes in the domestic pig in visual prosthesis development.

Authors:  Helmut G Sachs; Thomas Schanze; Ursula Brunner; Heiko Sailer; Christoph Wiesenack
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina with acutely implanted electrode arrays.

Authors:  Florian Gekeler; Karin Kobuch; Hartmut Normann Schwahn; Alfred Stett; Kei Shinoda; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Implant-retained prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects.

Authors:  W J Moran; J A Toljanic; W R Panje
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-01

10.  Vision change after sheet transplant of fetal retina with retinal pigment epithelium to a patient with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Norman D Radtke; Robert B Aramant; Magdalene J Seiler; Heywood M Petry; Diane Pidwell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [What can blind patients see in daily life with the subretinal Alpha IMS implant? Current overview from the clinical trial in Tübingen].

Authors:  K Stingl; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Besch; F Gekeler; U Greppmaier; G Hörtdörfer; A Koitschev; T Peters; H Sachs; B Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Repeated transchoroidal implantation and explantation of compound subretinal prostheses: an exploratory study in rabbits.

Authors:  Florian Gekeler; Karin Kobuch; Georgios Blatsios; Eberhart Zrenner; Kei Shinoda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Development of a minimally invasive retinal implant system].

Authors:  H Gerding
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of retinal and optic nerve morphology in animal subjects: practical considerations.

Authors:  Gillian J McLellan; Carol A Rasmussen
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 1.644

Review 7.  Role of electrical activity in promoting neural repair.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Development of surgical techniques for implantation of a wireless intraocular epiretinal retina implant in Göttingen minipigs.

Authors:  Thomas Laube; Claudia Brockmann; Gernot Roessler; Peter Walter; Christine Krueger; Michael Goertz; Susanne Klauke; Norbert Bornfeld
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Toward a wide-field retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Hossein Ameri; Tanapat Ratanapakorn; Stefan Ufer; Helmut Eckhardt; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.