Literature DB >> 16125172

Implantation and testing of subretinal film electrodes in domestic pigs.

Thomas Schanze1, Helmut G Sachs, Christoph Wiesenack, Ursula Brunner, Heiko Sailer.   

Abstract

By definition, an electronic subretinal visual prosthesis requires the implantation of stimulation electrodes in the subretinal space of the eye. Polyimide film electrodes with flat contacts were implanted subretinally and used for electrical stimulation in acute experiments in anaesthetised domestic pigs. In two pigs, the film electrode was inserted through a sclerostomy into the vitreous cavity and, subsequently, via a retinotomy into the subretinal space around the posterior pole (ab interno approach). In three other pigs the sclera and pigment epithelium were opened for combined ab interno and transscleral positioning of the subretinal electrode. In all cases, perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) was used to establish a close contact between the film electrode and the outer retina. After cranial preparations of three pigs for epidural recording of visual cortex responses, retinal stimulation was performed in one pig with a film electrode implanted ab interno and in two pigs with film electrodes implanted by the ab interno and transscleral procedure. The five subretinal implantations were carried out successfully and each polyimide film electrode tip was positioned beneath the outer retina of the posterior pole. The retina was attached to the stimulation electrode in all cases. Epidural cortical responses to light and electrical stimulation were recorded in three experiments. Initial cortical responses to Ganzfeld light and to electrical stimuli occurred about 40 and 20 ms, respectively, after stimulation onset. The stimulation threshold was approximately 100 microA and, like the cortical response amplitudes, depended both on the correspondence between retinal stimulation and cortical recording sites and on the number of stimulation electrodes used simultaneously. Our results in a domestic pig model demonstrate that polyimide film electrodes can be implanted subretinally and tested by recording cortical responses to electrical stimulation. These findings suggest that the domestic pig could be an appropriate animal model for basic testing of subretinal implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16125172     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  7 in total

1.  Subretinal electrode implantation in the P23H rat for chronic stimulations.

Authors:  J Salzmann; O P Linderholm; J-L Guyomard; M Paques; M Simonutti; M Lecchi; J Sommerhalder; E Dubus; M Pelizzone; D Bertrand; J Sahel; P Renaud; A B Safran; S Picaud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Compound subretinal prostheses with extra-ocular parts designed for human trials: successful long-term implantation in pigs.

Authors:  Florian Gekeler; Peter Szurman; Salvatore Grisanti; Ulrike Weiler; Rolf Claus; Tim-Oliver Greiner; Michael Völker; Konrad Kohler; Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Communication and Control System for a 15-Channel Hermetic Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Shawn K Kelly; Douglas B Shire; Jinghua Chen; Patrick Doyle; Marcus D Gingerich; Stuart F Cogan; William A Drohan; Luke S Theogarajan; John L Wyatt; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.880

5.  A hermetic wireless subretinal neurostimulator for vision prostheses.

Authors:  Shawn K Kelly; Douglas B Shire; Jinghua Chen; Patrick Doyle; Marcus D Gingerich; Stuart F Cogan; William A Drohan; Sonny Behan; Luke Theogarajan; John L Wyatt; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  A suprachoroidal electrical retinal stimulator design for long-term animal experiments and in vivo assessment of its feasibility and biocompatibility in rabbits.

Authors:  J A Zhou; S J Woo; S I Park; E T Kim; J M Seo; H Chung; S J Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2008
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.