Literature DB >> 16643946

Sub-microsecond protein folding.

Jan Kubelka1, Thang K Chiu, David R Davies, William A Eaton, James Hofrichter.   

Abstract

We have investigated the structure, equilibria, and folding kinetics of an engineered 35-residue subdomain of the chicken villin headpiece, an ultrafast-folding protein. Substitution of two buried lysine residues by norleucine residues stabilizes the protein by 1 kcal/mol and increases the folding rate sixfold, as measured by nanosecond laser T-jump. The folding rate at 300 K is (0.7 micros)(-1) with little or no temperature dependence, making this protein the first sub-microsecond folder, with a rate only twofold slower than the theoretically predicted speed limit. Using the 70 ns process to obtain the effective diffusion coefficient, the free energy barrier height is estimated from Kramers theory to be less than approximately 1 kcal/mol. X-ray crystallographic determination at 1A resolution shows no significant change in structure compared to the single-norleucine-substituted molecule and suggests that the increased stability is electrostatic in origin. The ultrafast folding rate, very accurate X-ray structure, and small size make this engineered villin subdomain an ideal system for simulation by atomistic molecular dynamics with explicit solvent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16643946     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  96 in total

1.  Folding pathways of proteins with increasing degree of sequence identities but different structure and function.

Authors:  Rajanish Giri; Angela Morrone; Carlo Travaglini-Allocatelli; Per Jemth; Maurizio Brunori; Stefano Gianni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Simple few-state models reveal hidden complexity in protein folding.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Robert McGibbon; Yu-Shan Lin; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hydrophobic core formation and dehydration in protein folding studied by generalized-ensemble simulations.

Authors:  Takao Yoda; Yuji Sugita; Yuko Okamoto
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Tackling force-field bias in protein folding simulations: folding of Villin HP35 and Pin WW domains in explicit water.

Authors:  Jeetain Mittal; Robert B Best
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The origin of nonmonotonic complex behavior and the effects of nonnative interactions on the diffusive properties of protein folding.

Authors:  Ronaldo J Oliveira; Paul C Whitford; Jorge Chahine; Jin Wang; José N Onuchic; Vitor B P Leite
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Protein folded states are kinetic hubs.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Folding of the Pit1 homeodomain near the speed limit.

Authors:  Wiktor Banachewicz; Christopher M Johnson; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterizing a partially ordered miniprotein through folding molecular dynamics simulations: Comparison with the experimental data.

Authors:  Athanasios S Baltzis; Nicholas M Glykos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  New tricks for old dogs: improving the accuracy of biomolecular force fields by pair-specific corrections to non-bonded interactions.

Authors:  Jejoong Yoo; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Detection of a transient intermediate in a rapid protein folding process by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kan-Nian Hu; Wai-Ming Yau; Robert Tycko
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.