Literature DB >> 20682244

Tackling force-field bias in protein folding simulations: folding of Villin HP35 and Pin WW domains in explicit water.

Jeetain Mittal1, Robert B Best.   

Abstract

The ability to fold proteins on a computer has highlighted the fact that existing force fields tend to be biased toward a particular type of secondary structure. Consequently, force fields for folding simulations are often chosen according to the native structure, implying that they are not truly "transferable." Here we show that, while the AMBER ff03 potential is known to favor helical structures, a simple correction to the backbone potential (ff03( *)) results in an unbiased energy function. We take as examples the 35-residue alpha-helical Villin HP35 and 37 residue beta-sheet Pin WW domains, which had not previously been folded with the same force field. Starting from unfolded configurations, simulations of both proteins in Amber ff03( *) in explicit solvent fold to within 2.0 A RMSD of the experimental structures. This demonstrates that a simple backbone correction results in a more transferable force field, an important requirement if simulations are to be used to interpret folding mechanism. 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20682244      PMCID: PMC2913180          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  36 in total

1.  Mapping the transition state of the WW domain beta-sheet.

Authors:  J C Crane; E K Koepf; J W Kelly; M Gruebele
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Smaller and faster: the 20-residue Trp-cage protein folds in 4 micros.

Authors:  Linlin Qiu; Suzette A Pabit; Adrian E Roitberg; Stephen J Hagen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Folding a protein in a computer: an atomic description of the folding/unfolding of protein A.

Authors:  Angel E García; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temperature-dependent dynamics of the villin headpiece helical subdomain, an unusually small thermostable protein.

Authors:  Liliya Vugmeyster; Oleg Trott; C James McKnight; Daniel P Raleigh; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Experimental tests of villin subdomain folding simulations.

Authors:  Jan Kubelka; William A Eaton; James Hofrichter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields.

Authors:  Alexander D MacKerell; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms.

Authors:  Stefano Gianni; Nicholas R Guydosh; Faaizah Khan; Teresa D Caldas; Ugo Mayor; George W N White; Mari L DeMarco; Valerie Daggett; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical?

Authors:  Robert B Best; Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Alpha-helical stabilization by side chain shielding of backbone hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Angel E García; Kevin Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  42 in total

1.  Residue-specific α-helix propensities from molecular simulation.

Authors:  Robert B Best; David de Sancho; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Three force fields' views of the 3(10) helix.

Authors:  Kalliopi K Patapati; Nicholas M Glykos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Taming the complexity of protein folding.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Vincent A Voelz; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Characterizing a partially ordered miniprotein through folding molecular dynamics simulations: Comparison with the experimental data.

Authors:  Athanasios S Baltzis; Nicholas M Glykos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Comparing a simple theoretical model for protein folding with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Eric R Henry; Robert B Best; William A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Microscopic events in β-hairpin folding from alternative unfolded ensembles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization?

Authors:  Stefano Piana; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; David E Shaw
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Biomolecularmodeling and simulation: a field coming of age.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Leif Arthur Halvorsen; Segun Jung; Xia Xiao
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.318

9.  Electrostatics, structure prediction, and the energy landscapes for protein folding and binding.

Authors:  Min-Yeh Tsai; Weihua Zheng; D Balamurugan; Nicholas P Schafer; Bobby L Kim; Margaret S Cheung; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Structural Stability and Binding Strength of a Designed Peptide-Carbon Nanotube Hybrid.

Authors:  Daniel Roxbury; Shao-Qing Zhang; Jeetain Mittal; William F Degrado; Anand Jagota
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.