Literature DB >> 15586328

Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter.

Justin de Beer1, Danielle Petruccelli, Paul Zalzal, Mitchell J Winemaker.   

Abstract

A pilot cohort study of 60 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) was undertaken to evaluate the technical aspects and possible clinical advantages of performing THA through a single-incision, minimally invasive, 10-cm-length, direct lateral approach compared with the same approach performed through a standard-length skin incision. We could not show any significant difference with regard to operative time; in-hospital equianalgesic opioid consumption; postoperative blood loss; complications; hospital length of stay; or flexion, Harris Hip and Oxford Scores at 6 weeks' postoperatively. Restricting the length of skin incision for THA performed through a direct lateral approach does not appear to afford any clinical advantage to the patient in the short term. The mini-exposure creates technical challenges that have the potential to adversely affect primary THA outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15586328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  18 in total

Review 1.  What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Authors:  J M Lloyd; T Wainwright; R G Middleton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  [Transgluteal mini-incision. Technique and our own results].

Authors:  A Roth; F Layher; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Making minimally invasive THR safe: conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis.

Authors:  P C Noble; J D Johnston; J A Alexander; M T Thompson; M M Usrey; E M Heinrich; G C Landon; K B Mathis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Intraoperative dislocation of a trial femoral head into the pelvis during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yaron Bar Ziv; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve during minimally invasive hip surgery: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; Daniel W J Howcroft; Andrew W McCaskie; Craig H Gerrand
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  The mode of antifungal action of plant, insect and human defensins.

Authors:  A M Aerts; I E J A François; B P A Cammue; K Thevissen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - trend or state of the art?: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; R Bieger; D Wernerus; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference.

Authors:  J R Varela-Egocheaga; M A Suárez-Suárez; M Fernández-Villán; V González-Sastre; J R Varela-Gómez; A Murcia-Mazón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-12-03

Review 10.  Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Inge H F Reininga; Wiebren Zijlstra; Robert Wagenmakers; Alexander L Boerboom; Bregtje P Huijbers; Johan W Groothoff; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.