Literature DB >> 16636869

Results of instrumented posterolateral fusion in failed back surgery.

Walid Salah Badawy1, M A El Masry, Y A Radwan, T T El Haddidi.   

Abstract

The success rate following revision surgery for failed back surgery is inherently low. However, a general consensus for a satisfactory surgical intervention after failed disc surgery has not yet been reached. We present a cohort study of 25 adult cases treated by instrumented posterolateral fusion with or without nerve root exploration/decompression for recurrence or persistence of symptoms after previous disc surgery. The average age at surgery was 47 years (range 39-56 years). Complications were seen in four patients in the form of intraoperative dural tears. A satisfactory clinical outcome was seen in 80% of the patients, and the overall fusion rate was 93%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16636869      PMCID: PMC2532129          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0081-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

Review 1.  Stabilization of the lumbosacral spine in postlaminectomy syndromes. Technique and 2-year results.

Authors:  J Colemont; E Heinrich; J P Giehl; K Zielke
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments.

Authors:  E W Fritsch; J Heisel; S Rupp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

Authors:  J E Ricciardi; P C Pflueger; J E Isaza; T S Whitecloud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A biomechanical definition of spinal segmental instability taking personal and disc level differences into account.

Authors:  M Ito; S Tadano; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbar spine instability. A critical update and symposium summary.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Redecompression and fusion in failed back syndrome patients.

Authors:  J Biondi; B J Greenberg
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1990-12

7.  Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  C V Burton; W H Kirkaldy-Willis; K Yong-Hing; K B Heithoff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Curtis W Slipman; Carl H Shin; Rajeev K Patel; Zacharia Isaac; Chris W Huston; Jason S Lipetz; David A Lenrow; Debra L Braverman; Edward J Vresilovic
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Clinical instability of the lumbar spine after microdiscectomy.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Failed back surgery: etiology and diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  Jerome Schofferman; James Reynolds; Richard Herzog; Edward Covington; Paul Dreyfuss; Conor O'Neill
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Failed back (surgery) syndrome: time for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Carmen Lam Vleggeert-Lankamp; Mark P Arts; Wilco Ch Jacobs; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2013-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.