Literature DB >> 26516497

Failed back (surgery) syndrome: time for a paradigm shift.

Carmen Lam Vleggeert-Lankamp1, Mark P Arts2, Wilco Ch Jacobs1, Wilco C Peul3.   

Abstract

1. The group of patients with so-called 'failed back surgery syndrome' (FBSS) is very diverse. Published studies evaluating the outcome of surgical treatment vary widely in terms of surgical interventions that were performed. Results from these papers cannot be generally applied to all people who have persisting complaints after low back surgery. 2. The literature search that was performed demonstrated that the articles that scored as acceptable on assessment bias demonstrated a low to moderate patient-perceived recovery percentage. The only randomized controlled trial on this topic did not demonstrate a difference between instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercise. 3. Current research does not show repeat surgery to be successful in 'FBSS patients', but clinical practice indicates that, in a small, carefully selected group, repeat surgery can yield rewarding results. However, parameters that make a patient prone to recover from a subsequent surgical intervention cannot be found in the literature. 4. The term 'failed back surgery syndrome' implies a causative role of surgery in a problem situation; failed back surgery syndrome is frequently regarded as failed back surgery. The literature does not, however, provide evidence for this. 5. It is important to inform the patient adequately to shape realistic expectations. Preoperative evaluation of parameters evaluating the psychological condition could help to better predict the outcome of surgery. 6. The term 'failed back surgery syndrome' has been demonstrated to be an ill-defined term, serving as a container for all kinds of back and leg problems, and wrongly implying a definite role for the surgical intervention in the aetiology. We suggest shifting the paradigm to 'failed back syndrome'. With this term we suggest defining those patients with back and radicular leg pain without a structural deficit, or with a structural deficit that has a low a priori chance of benefiting from a surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed back; low back surgery; lumbar spondylodesis; revision low back surgery; spine surgery

Year:  2013        PMID: 26516497      PMCID: PMC4590153          DOI: 10.1177/2049463713479095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  26 in total

1.  Efficacy of less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy.

Authors:  S Lakkol; C Bhatia; R Taranu; R Pollock; S Hadgaonkar; M Krishna
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-11

2.  Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard B North; David H Kidd; Farrokh Farrokhi; Steven A Piantadosi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Ghassan Skaf; Carmel Bouclaous; Ali Alaraj; Roukoz Chamoun
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Ronald H M A Bartels; W F Tan; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

7.  Revision surgery for failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  S S Kim; C B Michelsen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox; Olav Reikerås; Øystein Nygaard; Roger Sørensen; Aage Indahl; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Oliver Grundnes; Johan Emil Lange; Astrid Friis
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Low-back pain following multiple lumbar spine procedures. Failure of initial selection?

Authors:  D M Spengler; C Freeman; R Westbrook; J W Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation.

Authors:  R B North; J N Campbell; C S James; M K Conover-Walker; H Wang; S Piantadosi; J D Rybock; D M Long
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  3 in total

1.  The appropriate management of persisting pain after spine surgery: a European panel study with recommendations based on the RAND/UCLA method.

Authors:  Volker M Tronnier; Sam Eldabe; Jörg Franke; Frank Huygen; Philippe Rigoard; Javier de Andres Ares; Richard Assaker; Alejandro Gomez-Rice; Marco La Grua; Maarten Moens; Lieven Moke; Christophe Perruchoud; Nasir A Quraishi; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Pedram Tabatabaei; Koen Van Boxem; Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp; Björn Zoëga; Herman J Stoevelaar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A Novel Treatment Combination for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, With a 41-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Case Report.

Authors:  Gianni F Maddalozzo; Kristine Aikenhead; Vani Sheth; Michelle N Perisic
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2019-01-25

3.  Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Robert Gordon Sorrell; Jamie Muhlenfeld; John Moffett; Gary Stevens; Steven Kesten
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.133

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.