Literature DB >> 8122535

Clinical instability of the lumbar spine after microdiscectomy.

E Kotilainen1, S Valtonen.   

Abstract

A total of 190 patients treated microsurgically for a virgin single level lumbar disc herniation were examined physically after a mean follow-up period of 3 years (range 21-68 months). Included were 99 (52%) men and 91 (48%) women with a mean age of 42 years. During the observation period, sciatica had completely recovered or markedly diminished in 172 (90%) patients, and 142 (75%) patients had returned to work. However, as many as 29% of the patients occasionally suffered from low back pain. Clinical examination revealed various signs and symptoms of segmental instability of the lumbar spine in 22% of the surgical patients. There was a significant association between postoperative instability and unsatisfactory long-term outcome: of the 42 patients with instability, 62% suffered from low back pain and 45% were on sick leave or retired because of the back, while the corresponding numbers for those patients without instability were 20% and 8%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Moreover, the mean value of the Oswestry index in instability patients was as high as 34% (SD 12), indicating moderate disability, whereas a significantly (p = 0.0001) lower Oswestry Index 16% (SD 13), indicating minimal disability, was detected in patients without instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8122535     DOI: 10.1007/bf01401838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  37 in total

1.  Primary instability of lumbar vertebrae as a common cause of low back pain.

Authors:  F P MORGAN; T KING
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1957-02

Review 2.  Instability of the lumbar spine. Pathology, treatment, and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.

Authors:  U Ebeling; W Reichenberg; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Late results of laminectomy for lumbar disc prolapse. A review after ten to twenty-five years.

Authors:  A Naylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1974-02

5.  Microdiscectomy versus chemonucleolysis.

Authors:  J C Maroon; A Abla
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Physical signs of instability.

Authors:  S V Paris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; E N Hanley; J Howe; D Kuhlmann; R E Matteri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease. A minimum ten-year followup.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; E Hanley; J Howe; D Kuhlmann; R Matteri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Microlumbar discectomy: followup of 147 patients.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  Results of instrumented posterolateral fusion in failed back surgery.

Authors:  Walid Salah Badawy; M A El Masry; Y A Radwan; T T El Haddidi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical application of a handy intraoperative measurement device for lumbar segmental instability.

Authors:  Yuichi Kasai; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Koji Akeda; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Endoscopic transforaminal suprapedicular approach in high grade inferior migrated lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Chang Il Ju; Seok Won Kim; Jong Gue Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

4.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Increase or decrease in stability after nucleotomy? Conflicting in vitro and in vivo results in the sheep model.

Authors:  Sandra Reitmaier; David Volkheimer; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ferdinand Krappel; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Giovanni Alessi; Jean-Michel Remacle; Luis Alberto Lopez; Jesus Javier Fernández; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cross-sectional areas of lumbar muscles after surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A study with magnetic resonance imaging after microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; A Alanen; R Parkkola; H Helenius; S Valtonen; M Kormano
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 8.  Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bahram Fakouri; Nitin R Shetty; Thomas C H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter?

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Harry Herkowitz; William A Abdu; Randy Woodward; Michael Longley; Sanford E Emery; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Clinical and radiological instability following standard fenestration discectomy.

Authors:  Amrithlal A Mascarenhas; Issac Thomas; Gaurav Sharma; Joe Joseph Cherian
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.