Literature DB >> 8278850

A biomechanical definition of spinal segmental instability taking personal and disc level differences into account.

M Ito1, S Tadano, K Kaneda.   

Abstract

The biomechanical definition of spinal segmental instability has not been clarified sufficiently, because of the great personal and level differences in intervertebral disc deformation. This article proposes a new method of judging spinal segmental instability regardless of these differences, using lateral functional radiographs. The linear relationship between the disc geometry and the disc deformation was confirmed in the normal intervertebral discs. The degree of spinal segmental instability could be evaluated statistically by calculating a regression residual from the regression line of the normal discs. Strain distributions of an intervertebral disc in the sagittal plane also were investigated to make sure of the differences in the deformation behaviors between normal spines and unstable lumbar spines. Although normal lumbar spines showed the consistent deformation pattern, the patterns of the unstable lumbar spines were different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8278850     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199311000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  The Fernstrom ball revisited.

Authors:  Krzysztof B Siemionow; Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Results of instrumented posterolateral fusion in failed back surgery.

Authors:  Walid Salah Badawy; M A El Masry; Y A Radwan; T T El Haddidi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; F Rohlmann; C Ring; C Mack; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative Analysis With Modified Inclined Technique for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy in Treating Cervical Osseous Foraminal Stenosis: Radiological and Midterm Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Dong Hwa Heo; Dong Chan Lee; Tae Hyun Kim; Choon Keun Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

6.  Failed back surgery syndrome: the role of symptomatic segmental single-level instability after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The Novel Technique of Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Contralateral Approach for Coexisting L5-S1 Lateral Recess, Foraminal, and Extraforaminal Stenosis and Its Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Hyeun Sung Kim; Jun Bok Jeon; Jun Hyung Lee; Jun Hwan Park; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Comparative Analysis of 3 Types of Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis, Uniportal-, Biportal Endoscopy, and Microsurgery: Radiologic and Midterm Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Hyun Jin Hong; Dong Chan Lee; Tae Hyun Kim; Jin Seob Hwang; Choon Keun Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-02-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.