Literature DB >> 16636793

Visual-tactile integration: does stimulus duration influence the relative amount of response enhancement?

Stefan Rach1, Adele Diederich.   

Abstract

Responses to multiple stimuli from different modalities tend to be faster compared to responses to each of these stimuli alone. Neurophysiological studies on higher mammals and behavioral studies on humans suggest that the relative amount of enhancement is inversely related to stimuli intensity. In two experiments the duration of visual and tactile stimuli was varied to investigate whether duration, as a further determinant of stimulus effectiveness, is also inversely related to the relative amount of response enhancement. Visual and tactile stimuli were presented left or right of fixation either in the same or different hemifields. Participants were required to gaze only at visual stimuli and to ignore tactile (focused attention paradigm). Saccadic reaction times were recorded. Results from both experiments show that the relative amount of response enhancement was largest for the shortest stimulus duration and decreases with increasing stimulus duration, i.e., inverse effectiveness of stimulus duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16636793     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0452-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  The influence of visual and auditory receptive field organization on multisensory integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  D C Kadunce; J W Vaughan; M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multimodal visual-somatosensory integration in saccade generation.

Authors:  Richard Amlôt; Robin Walker; Jon Driver; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation.

Authors:  M HERSHENSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-03

4.  Superior colliculus neurons use distinct operational modes in the integration of multisensory stimuli.

Authors:  Thomas J Perrault; J William Vaughan; Barry E Stein; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

6.  Modeling spatial effects in visual-tactile saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01

7.  Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; M H Clark; B A Edelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-06

8.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration.

Authors:  M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Saccade-related activity in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of burst and buildup cells.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time.

Authors:  S C Gielen; R A Schmidt; P J Van den Heuvel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  On quantifying multisensory interaction effects in reaction time and detection rate.

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-29

2.  Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crossmodal interaction in saccadic reaction time: separating multisensory from warning effects in the time window of integration model.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Thomas J Perrault; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Xiang Zhou; Lars A Ross; John J Foxe; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.