Literature DB >> 17515216

Modeling spatial effects in visual-tactile saccadic reaction time.

Adele Diederich1, Hans Colonius.   

Abstract

Saccadic reaction time (SRT) to visual targets tends to be shorter when nonvisual stimuli are presented in close temporal or spatial proximity, even when subjects are instructed to ignore the accessory input. Here, we investigate visual-tactile interaction effects on SRT under varying spatial configurations. SRT to bimodal stimuli was reduced by up to 30 msec, in comparison with responses to unimodal visual targets. In contrast to previous findings, the amount of multisensory facilitation did not decrease with increases in the physical distance between the target and the nontarget but depended on (1) whether the target and the nontarget were presented in the same hemifield (ipsilateral) or in different hemifields (contralateral), (2) the eccentricity of the stimuli, and (3) the frequency of the vibrotactile nontarget. The time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for SRT (Colonius & Diederich, 2004) is shown to yield an explicit characterization of the observed multisensory spatial interaction effects through the removal of the peripheral-processing effects of stimulus location and tactile frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17515216     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  Visual-tactile integration: does stimulus duration influence the relative amount of response enhancement?

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crossmodal interaction in saccadic reaction time: separating multisensory from warning effects in the time window of integration model.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Computing an optimal time window of audiovisual integration in focused attention tasks: illustrated by studies on effect of age and prior knowledge.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Ryan A Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius; Farid I Kandil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11

8.  To bridge or not to bridge the multisensory time gap: bimanual coordination to sound and touch with temporal lags.

Authors:  C Roy; S Dalla Bella; J Lagarde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Focused attention vs. crossmodal signals paradigm: deriving predictions from the time-window-of-integration model.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29

10.  Keeping in touch with the visual system: spatial alignment and multisensory integration of visual-somatosensory inputs.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Sophie Molholm; John S Butler; Pejman Sehatpour; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Walter Ritter; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.