Literature DB >> 20512352

On quantifying multisensory interaction effects in reaction time and detection rate.

Stefan Rach1, Adele Diederich, Hans Colonius.   

Abstract

Both mean reaction time (RT) and detection rate (DR) are important measures for assessing the amount of multisensory interaction occurring in crossmodal experiments, but they are often applied separately. Here we demonstrate that measuring multisensory performance using either RT or DR alone misses out on important information. We suggest an integration of RT and DR into a single measure of multisensory performance: the first index (MRE*) is based on an arithmetic combination of RT and DR, the second (MPE) is constructed from parameters derived from fitting a sequential sampling model to RT and DR data simultaneously. Our approach is illustrated by data from two audio-visual experiments. In the first, a redundant targets detection experiment using stimuli of different intensity, both measures yield similar pattern of results supporting the "principle of inverse effectiveness". The second experiment, introducing stimulus onset asynchrony and differing instructions (focused attention vs. redundant targets task) further supports the usefulness of both indices. Statistical properties of both measures are investigated via bootstrapping procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20512352     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0289-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  45 in total

1.  Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Multimodal visual-somatosensory integration in saccade generation.

Authors:  Richard Amlôt; Robin Walker; Jon Driver; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

5.  Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Cross-modal interaction between vision and hearing: a speed-accuracy analysis.

Authors:  Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-04

7.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; M H Clark; B A Edelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-06

10.  On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time.

Authors:  S C Gielen; R A Schmidt; P J Van den Heuvel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08
View more
  23 in total

1.  Sequential modulation of (bottom-up) response activation and inhibition in a response conflict task: a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Barbara Treccani; Giorgia Cona; Nadia Milanese; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-09

2.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Atypical Spatial Attention in Those with a High Level of Self-reported Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Stephanie A Dunn; Megan Freeth; Elizabeth Milne
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-06

4.  Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis.

Authors:  Joseph W Houpt; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Grasping others' movements: Rapid discrimination of object size from observed hand movements.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Andrea Cavallo; Atesh Koul; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Laura Taverna; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Role of audiovisual synchrony in driving head orienting responses.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Rob Gray; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A simple vector-like law for perceptual information combination is also followed by a class of cortical multisensory bimodal neurons.

Authors:  Vincent A Billock; Micah J Kinney; Jan W H Schnupp; M Alex Meredith
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-05-13

8.  Should I stay or should I go--cognitive conflict in multi-attribute signals probed with East and West German 'Ampelmännchen' traffic signs.

Authors:  Claudia Peschke; Bettina Olk; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Sound Frequency on Audiovisual Integration: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Weiping Yang; Jingjing Yang; Yulin Gao; Xiaoyu Tang; Yanna Ren; Satoshi Takahashi; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fractionating the unitary notion of dissociation: disembodied but not embodied dissociative experiences are associated with exocentric perspective-taking.

Authors:  Jason J Braithwaite; Kelly James; Hayley Dewe; Nick Medford; Chie Takahashi; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.