Literature DB >> 1663526

Spike discharge properties that are related to the characteristic frequency of single units in the frog auditory nerve.

D A Ronken1.   

Abstract

Single units from the auditory nerve of frogs and toads have their receptor cells located in two separate sensory organs that provide disjoint frequency ranges. The amphibian papilla (ap) provides units with characteristic frequency (CF) in the low- and mid-frequency regions and the basilar papilla (bp) provides units with high CF. There are gross differences in both the mechanical design and innervation patterns of the two organs, so that one might expect discharge properties for units with different CF to differ in many respects. However, there have been few reports of response attributes that correlate strongly with CF for units in the mid- and high-CF regions. Measurements of automated tuning curves from 250 units in Rana pipiens show that W10 dB, the bandwidth of the tuning curve measured 10 dB above CF threshold, is consistently larger for high-CF units than for low- and mid-frequency units. When units are classified into three groups by an objective statistical method using only CF and W10 dB measurements, the groups appear to correspond reasonably well with the low-, mid-, and high-frequency categories identified in many other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1663526     DOI: 10.1121/1.402047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The electrical properties of auditory hair cells in the frog amphibian papilla.

Authors:  M S Smotherman; P M Narins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

4.  Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-25

5.  Beyond the limits: identifying the high-frequency detectors in the anuran ear.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

8.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids by frog auditory nerve fibers: importance in AM coding.

Authors:  A S Feng; W Y Lin; L Sun
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear.

Authors:  Richard L M Schoffelen; Johannes M Segenhout; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Stimulus change detection in phasic auditory units in the frog midbrain: frequency and ear specific adaptation.

Authors:  Abhilash Ponnath; Kim L Hoke; Hamilton E Farris
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.