Literature DB >> 7965920

Detection of gaps in sinusoids by frog auditory nerve fibers: importance in AM coding.

A S Feng1, W Y Lin, L Sun.   

Abstract

Physiological studies were carried out in the frog (Rana pipiens pipiens) eighth nerve to determine: (i) whether the modulation rate or the silent gap was the salient feature that set the upper limit of time-locking to pulsed amplitude-modulated (PAM) stimuli, (ii) the gap detection capacity of individual eighth nerve fibers. Time-locked responses of 79 eighth nerve fibers to PAM stimuli (at the fiber's characteristic frequency) showed that the synchronization coefficient was a low-pass function of the modulation rate. In response to PAM stimuli having different pulse durations, a fiber gave rise to non-overlapping modulation transfer functions. The upper cut-off frequency of time locking was higher when tone-pulses in PAM stimuli had shorter duration. The fact that the cut-off frequency was different for the different PAM series suggested that the AM rate was neither the sole, nor the main, determinant for the decay in time-locking at high AM rates. Gap detection capacity was determined for 69 eighth nerve fibers by assessing fiber's spiking activities to paired tone-pulses during an OFF-window and an ON-window. It was found that the minimum detectable gap of eighth nerve fibers ranged from 0.5 to 10 ms with an average of 1.23-2.16 ms depending on the duration of paired tone pulses. For each fiber, the minimum detectable gap was longer when the duration of tone pulses comprising the twin-pulse stimuli was more than four times longer. When the synchronization coefficient was plotted against the silent gap between tones pulses in the PAM stimuli, the gap response functions of a fiber as derived from multiple PAM series were equivalent to gap response functions deriving from twin-pulse series suggesting that it was the silent gap which primarily determined the upper limit of time-locking to PAM stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965920     DOI: 10.1007/BF00199475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  44 in total

1.  Detection of gaps in noise by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata).

Authors:  K Okanoya; R J Dooling
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Temporal integration in an anuran auditory nerve.

Authors:  R Dunia; P M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Noise susceptibility and immunity of phase locking in amphibian auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P M Narins; I Wagner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of tone-pulse rise time on rate-level functions of cat auditory cortex neurons: excitatory and inhibitory processes shaping responses to tone onset.

Authors:  D P Phillips
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Anesthesia in amphibians and reptiles.

Authors:  H M Kaplan
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1969 Jul-Aug

6.  Sound intensity processing by the goldfish.

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses.

Authors:  D M Harris; P Dallos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Peripheral basis of sound localization in anurans. Acoustic properties of the frog's ear.

Authors:  A S Feng; W P Shofner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Frequency and time domain comparison of low-frequency auditory fiber responses in two anuran amphibians.

Authors:  C M Hillery; P M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  4 in total

1.  Encoding of temporal features of auditory stimuli in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body and superior paraolivary nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  A Kadner; A S Berrebi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Evolutionary conservation and neuronal mechanisms of auditory perceptual restoration.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Stimulus change detection in phasic auditory units in the frog midbrain: frequency and ear specific adaptation.

Authors:  Abhilash Ponnath; Kim L Hoke; Hamilton E Farris
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 1.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.