Literature DB >> 16634665

Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.

Johannes Hönekopp1.   

Abstract

Misconstruing the meaning of Cronbach's alpha, experts on facial attractiveness have conveyed the impression that facial-attractiveness judgment standards are largely shared. This claim is unsubstantiated, because information necessary for deciding whether judgments of facial attractiveness are more influenced by commonly shared or by privately held evaluation standards is lacking. Three experiments, using diverse face and rater samples to investigate the relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness, are reported. These experiments show that for a variety of ancillary conditions, and contrary to the prevalent notion in the literature, private taste is about as powerful as shared taste. Important implications for scientific research strategy and laypeople's self-esteem are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634665     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  38 in total

1.  Influence of network dynamics on the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  Sebastián Risau-Gusman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Improving assessment of personality disorder traits through social network analysis.

Authors:  Allan Clifton; Eric Turkheimer; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2007-10

3.  The role of the amygdala in implicit evaluation of emotionally neutral faces.

Authors:  Alexander Todorov; Andrew D Engell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Subjective and objective facial attractiveness: ratings and gender differences in objective appraisals of female faces.

Authors:  Mark S Nestor; Mark A Stillman; Andrew C Frisina
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-12

5.  Double standards in body evaluation? The influence of identification with body stimuli on ratings of attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass.

Authors:  Mona M Voges; Claire-Marie Giabbiconi; Benjamin Schöne; Manuel Waldorf; Andrea S Hartmann; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach.

Authors:  Alexander Todorov; Sean G Baron; Nikolaas N Oosterhof
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  J von Bremen; C Erbe; H Pancherz; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.