Literature DB >> 21203353

Subjective and objective facial attractiveness: ratings and gender differences in objective appraisals of female faces.

Mark S Nestor, Mark A Stillman, Andrew C Frisina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have not adequately compared subjective/objective ratings of female dermatology patients including patients presenting for cosmetic procedures.
OBJECTIVE: To examine objective versus subjective facial attractiveness ratings, demographic variables, and how men versus women judge female facial attractiveness.
METHODS: Sixty-five women (mean 42 years) presenting to a dermatology office. Subjects filled out a demographic and attractiveness questionnaire and were photographed. Four judges (2 male and 2 female) rated the photographs on a predefined 1 to 7 scale.
RESULTS: Mean subjective rating (subjects rating themselves) was 4.85 versus 3.61 for objective rating (judges rating subjects) (p<0.001). The mean age of subjects self-rating (subjective rating) who rated themselves in the 5 to 7 range was 39 years; the mean age of subjects self-rating (subjective rating) who rated themselves in the 3 to 4 range was 45 years (p=0.053). The mean age of subjects objectively rated by judges in the 5 to 7 range was 33 years; the mean age of subjects objectively rated by judges in the 3 to 4 range was 43 years (p<0.001); and the mean age of subjects objectively rated by judges in the 1 to 2 range was 50 years (p<0.001). The mean subjective rating (subjects rating themselves) for married women was 4.55 versus 5.27 for unmarried women (p=0.007); the mean objective rating (judges rating subjects) was 3.22 versus 4.15 (p<0.001). The mean objective rating by male judges was 3.09 versus 4.12 for female judges (p<0.001)
CONCLUSION: Female patients presenting to a dermatology office rated themselves more attractive than did judges who viewed photographs of the subjects. Age and marital status were significant factors, and male judges rated attractiveness lower than female judges. Limitations of the study, implications, and suggestions for future research directions are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21203353      PMCID: PMC3013552     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol        ISSN: 1941-2789


  14 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

Authors:  J H Langlois; L Kalakanis; A J Rubenstein; A Larson; M Hallam; M Smoot
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?

Authors:  G Rhodes; L A. Zebrowitz; A Clark; S M. Kalick; A Hightower; R McKay
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.178

4.  Differences in measured and self-reported height and weight in Dutch adolescents.

Authors:  W Jansen; P M van de Looij-Jansen; I Ferreira; E J de Wilde; J Brug
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 3.374

5.  Beyond initial attraction: physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage.

Authors:  James K McNulty; Lisa A Neff; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2008-02

6.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison.

Authors:  L Mealey; R Bridgstock; G C Townsend
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

7.  Ratings of physical attractiveness as a function of age.

Authors:  E W Mathes; S M Brennan; P M Haugen; H B Rice
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-04

8.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Body image dissatisfaction in women seeking rhytidectomy or blepharoplasty.

Authors:  D B Sarwer; L A Whitaker; T A Wadden; M J Pertschuk
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K A May; S Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rhinoplasty and its effects on the perception of beauty.

Authors:  Hernan Chinski; Luis Chinski; Jenny Armijos; Juan Pablo Arias
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01

2.  Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Hui Shen; Desmond K P Chau; Jianpo Su; Ling-Li Zeng; Weixiong Jiang; Jufang He; Jintu Fan; Dewen Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Female Facial Attractiveness Assessed from Three-Dimensional Contour Lines by University Students.

Authors:  Jinwara Jirathamopas; Yu Fang Liao; Ellen Wen-Ching Ko; Yu-Ray Chen; Chiung Shing Huang
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-22

4.  Perception of aesthetics and personality traits in orthognathic surgery patients: A comparison of still and moving images.

Authors:  Klaus Sinko; Ulrich S Tran; Arno Wutzl; Rudolf Seemann; Gabriele Millesi; Reinhold Jagsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Effect of Romantic Relationships on the Evaluation of the Attractiveness of One's Own Face.

Authors:  Jiaye Cai; Yan Zheng; Pei Li; Bin Ye; Hongyan Liu; Liezhong Ge
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-04-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.