Literature DB >> 29058270

Double standards in body evaluation? The influence of identification with body stimuli on ratings of attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass.

Mona M Voges1, Claire-Marie Giabbiconi2, Benjamin Schöne3, Manuel Waldorf2, Andrea S Hartmann2, Silja Vocks2.   

Abstract

Although it is well documented that women evaluate their own body differently from other bodies, it remains unclear whether this discrepancy is based on double standards because of identity or on objective differences between these bodies. The aim of this study was therefore to test whether women apply double standards depending on a body's identity when evaluating the same bodies presented with different faces. Average-weight women (N = 104) rated body attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic, and hypermuscular bodies with either another female's face or their own face. With their own face, subjects rated overweight bodies as more unattractive, higher in body fat and lower in muscle mass than with another female's face. However, for non-overweight bodies, body ratings did not differ depending on body identity. Based on the self-deprecating double standards for overweight bodies, a body-related identity bias might be considered in theoretical models of body image.Level of evidence Level V, descriptive study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body attractiveness; Body evaluation; Body image; Double standards; Identity; Self-deprecating bias

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29058270     DOI: 10.1007/s40519-017-0450-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Weight Disord        ISSN: 1124-4909            Impact factor:   4.652


  16 in total

Review 1.  The neural correlates of visual self-recognition.

Authors:  Christel Devue; Serge Brédart
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-09-28

2.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli.

Authors:  Meredith Minear; Denise C Park
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

Review 3.  The stigma of obesity: a review and update.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Chelsea A Heuer
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-02

5.  Body weight dissatisfaction: a comparison of women with and without eating disorders.

Authors:  Elise Coker; Suzanne Abraham
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

Review 6.  Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly C Berg; Carol B Peterson; Patricia Frazier; Scott J Crow
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  Get your own mirror. Investigating how strict eating disordered women are in judging the bodies of other eating disordered women.

Authors:  Jessica Alleva; Anita Jansen; Carolien Martijn; Jan Schepers; Chantal Nederkoorn
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Cognitive-behavioral theories of eating disorders.

Authors:  Donald A Williamson; Marney A White; Emily York-Crowe; Tiffany M Stewart
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2004-11

9.  Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Taryn A Myers; Janis H Crowther
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2009-11

Review 10.  Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy.

Authors:  Corinna Jacobi; Chris Hayward; Martina de Zwaan; Helena C Kraemer; W Stewart Agras
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  2 in total

1.  Giving a Body a Different Face-How Men and Women Evaluate Their Own Body vs. That of Others.

Authors:  Mona M Voges; Hannah L Quittkat; Benjamin Schöne; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Faced with one's fear: Attentional bias in anorexia nervosa and healthy individuals upon confrontation with an obese body stimulus in an eye-tracking paradigm.

Authors:  AndreaSabrina Hartmann; Tiana Borgers; Jennifer Joanne Thomas; Claire-Marie Giabbiconi; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.708

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.