Literature DB >> 16634111

Maternal age-specific fetal loss rates in Down syndrome pregnancies.

George M Savva1, Joan K Morris, David E Mutton, Eva Alberman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancies affected by Down syndrome (DS) have a greater risk of spontaneous fetal loss than those that are unaffected. In this article, we investigate the relationship between maternal age and the risk of spontaneous fetal loss in DS pregnancies.
METHODS: Fetal loss at different maternal ages were estimated by survival analysis using follow-up of 5177 prenatally diagnosed cases. The maternal age effect on loss rate was subsequently confirmed by a re-analysis of published comparisons of the maternal age-specific prevalence of DS at different gestational ages.
RESULTS: The average fetal loss rate between the time of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and term was 32% (95% CI: 26-38), increasing from 23% (95% CI: 16-31) for women aged 25 to 44% (33-56) for women aged 45. The average fetal loss rate between the time of amniocentesis and term was 25% (21-31), increasing from 19% (14-27) to 33% (26-45) across the same age range.
CONCLUSION: The fetal loss rate in DS pregnancies increases with maternal age, and this has consequences when estimating the live birth prevalence of DS in the presence of prenatal diagnosis and termination, and when assessing the performance of prenatal screening techniques. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634111     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  21 in total

1.  Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening.

Authors:  Maria Loane; Joan K Morris; Marie-Claude Addor; Larraitz Arriola; Judith Budd; Berenice Doray; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Martin Haeusler; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr Melve; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Bob McDonnell; Carmel Mullaney; Mary O'Mahony; Annette Queisser-Wahrendorf; Judith Rankin; Anke Rissmann; Catherine Rounding; Joaquin Salvador; David Tucker; Diana Wellesley; Lyubov Yevtushok; Helen Dolk
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Parental-age effects in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Santhosh Girirajan
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Blythe G Crissman; Cori D Feist; Susan L Sell; Lisa R Johnson; Kelly C Donahue; Diane Masser-Frye; Gail S Brookshire; Amanda M Carre; Danielle Lagrave; Campbell K Brasington
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The prevalence of live birth Down syndrome in the region of Primorsko-goranska County in Croatia, 1996-2005: the impact of screening and amniocentesis.

Authors:  Bojana Brajenović-Milić; Igor Prpić; Oleg Petrović; Smiljana Ristić; Gordana Brumini; Miljenko Kapović
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-22

Review 6.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

Review 7.  Down syndrome.

Authors:  Stylianos E Antonarakis; Brian G Skotko; Michael S Rafii; Andre Strydom; Sarah E Pape; Diana W Bianchi; Stephanie L Sherman; Roger H Reeves
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  Live births, natural losses, and elective terminations with Down syndrome in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Gert de Graaf; Frank Buckley; Brian G Skotko
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Down syndrome and type I interferon: not so simple.

Authors:  Louise Malle; Dusan Bogunovic
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.268

10.  Trends in Down's syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register.

Authors:  Joan K Morris; Eva Alberman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.