Literature DB >> 17712614

The prevalence of live birth Down syndrome in the region of Primorsko-goranska County in Croatia, 1996-2005: the impact of screening and amniocentesis.

Bojana Brajenović-Milić1, Igor Prpić, Oleg Petrović, Smiljana Ristić, Gordana Brumini, Miljenko Kapović.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of live birth Down syndrome (DS) in the region of Primorsko-goranska County (PGC) in Croatia from 1996 to 2005 and to evaluate the impact of second-trimester maternal serum screening (MSS) and amniocentesis on live birth DS prevalence.
METHODS: Study was based on databases from the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Centre Rijeka, the Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, and the Croatian National Institute of Public Health. The regional policy of prenatal diagnosis for DS includes amniocentesis for pregnant women aged 35 or over and MSS for younger women. We estimated live birth and total prevalence of DS and measured the proportion of pregnant women using MSS and amniocentesis. Trends of live birth and total prevalence of DS were tested by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: The live birth prevalence of DS was 1.4/1000 in the period 1996-2005. A decreasing, but nonsignificant, trend of prevalence was observed over time (P = 0.577). Women aged 35 or over represented 11.6% of all pregnant women included in the study. The proportion of women who had MSS was 33.9%. The proportion who underwent amniocentesis was 6.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: No marked decrease in prevalence of live birth DS was observed in the region of PGC during the last 10 years. The usage of MSS and amniocentesis was too low to have any significant impact on live birth DS prevalence. Women's, as well as physician's, knowledge and attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis of DS should be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17712614     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-007-0272-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  14 in total

1.  Major decrease in the incidence of trisomy 21 at birth in south Belgium: mass impact of triple test?

Authors:  A Verloes; Y Gillerot; L Van Maldergem; R Schoos; C Herens; M Jamar; V Dideberg; S Lesenfants; L Koulischer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  The triple-marker test in predicting fetal aneuploidy: a compromise between sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  K Huderer-Duric; S Skrablin; I Kuvacic; Z Sonicki; D Rubala; E Suchanek
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Janine Goujard; François Goffinet
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Screening for Down's syndrome and neural tube defect in Croatia. A regional prospective study.

Authors:  B Brajenović-Milić; D Tislarić; J Bacić; J Paravić; A E Slivar; M Kapovic; V Kosec; S Ristic; B Rajhvajn
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  The evolving national birth prevalence of Down syndrome in Taiwan. A study on the impact of second-trimester maternal serum screening.

Authors:  Hei-Jen Jou; Yih-Shing Kuo; Jenn-Jeih Hsu; Ming-Kwang Shyu; T'sang-T'ang Hsieh; Fon-Jou Hsieh
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Reasons for women's non-uptake of amniocentesis.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; G Macquart-Moulin; J P Moatti; Y Aurran; F Chabal; S Aymé
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  The impact of maternal serum screening on the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome and the use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in South Australia.

Authors:  T Cheffins; A Chan; E A Haan; E Ranieri; R G Ryall; R J Keane; R Byron-Scott; H Scott; E M Gjerde; A M Nguyen; J H Ford; S Sykes
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Trends in live birth prevalence of down syndrome in the Northern Netherlands 1987-96: the impact of screening and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  M J Wortelboer; B T De Wolf; C C Verschuuren-Bemelmans; J Reefhuis; A Mantingh; J R Beekhuis; M C Cornel
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 9.  Advances in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: I. general principles and second trimester testing.

Authors:  Peter A Benn
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.786

10.  Trends and geographic inequalities in the prevalence of Down syndrome in Europe, 1980-1999.

Authors:  H Dolk; M Loane; E Garne; H De Walle; A Queisser-Luft; C De Vigan; M C Addor; B Gener; M Haeusler; H Jordan; D Tucker; C Stoll; M Feijoo; D Lillis; F Bianchi
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.019

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 2.  Down Syndrome Screening in India: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  K Manikandan; Suresh Seshadri
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-08-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.