Literature DB >> 22713804

Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening.

Maria Loane1, Joan K Morris, Marie-Claude Addor, Larraitz Arriola, Judith Budd, Berenice Doray, Ester Garne, Miriam Gatt, Martin Haeusler, Babak Khoshnood, Kari Klungsøyr Melve, Anna Latos-Bielenska, Bob McDonnell, Carmel Mullaney, Mary O'Mahony, Annette Queisser-Wahrendorf, Judith Rankin, Anke Rissmann, Catherine Rounding, Joaquin Salvador, David Tucker, Diana Wellesley, Lyubov Yevtushok, Helen Dolk.   

Abstract

This study examines trends and geographical differences in total and live birth prevalence of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 with regard to increasing maternal age and prenatal diagnosis in Europe. Twenty-one population-based EUROCAT registries covering 6.1 million births between 1990 and 2009 participated. Trisomy cases included live births, fetal deaths from 20 weeks gestational age and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly. We present correction to 20 weeks gestational age (ie, correcting early terminations for the probability of fetal survival to 20 weeks) to allow for artefactual screening-related differences in total prevalence. Poisson regression was used. The proportion of births in the population to mothers aged 35+ years in the participating registries increased from 13% in 1990 to 19% in 2009. Total prevalence per 10000 births was 22.0 (95% CI 21.7-22.4) for trisomy 21, 5.0 (95% CI 4.8-5.1) for trisomy 18 and 2.0 (95% CI 1.9-2.2) for trisomy 13; live birth prevalence was 11.2 (95% CI 10.9-11.5) for trisomy 21, 1.04 (95% CI 0.96-1.12) for trisomy 18 and 0.48 (95% CI 0.43-0.54) for trisomy 13. There was an increase in total and total corrected prevalence of all three trisomies over time, mainly explained by increasing maternal age. Live birth prevalence remained stable over time. For trisomy 21, there was a three-fold variation in live birth prevalence between countries. The rise in maternal age has led to an increase in the number of trisomy-affected pregnancies in Europe. Live birth prevalence has remained stable overall. Differences in prenatal screening and termination between countries lead to wide variation in live birth prevalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22713804      PMCID: PMC3522199          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  23 in total

1.  A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Janine Goujard; François Goffinet
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Changes in fetal prevalence and outcome for trisomies 13 and 18: a population-based study over 23 years.

Authors:  Claire Irving; Sam Richmond; Christoper Wren; Caitlin Longster; Nicholas D Embleton
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-04-12

3.  Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006.

Authors:  Samantha E Parker; Cara T Mai; Mark A Canfield; Russel Rickard; Ying Wang; Robert E Meyer; Patrick Anderson; Craig A Mason; Julianne S Collins; Russell S Kirby; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-09-28

Review 4.  Delayed childbearing.

Authors:  G Breart
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Epidemiologic study of Down syndrome in a racially diverse California population, 1989-1991.

Authors:  J Bishop; C A Huether; C Torfs; F Lorey; J Deddens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Maternal age-specific rates for Down syndrome: changes over time.

Authors:  P A Baird; A D Sadovnick
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1988-04

7.  The natural history of Down syndrome conceptuses diagnosed prenatally that are not electively terminated.

Authors:  E B Hook; D E Mutton; R Ide; E Alberman; M Bobrow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Paper 1: The EUROCAT network--organization and processes.

Authors:  Patricia A Boyd; Martin Haeusler; Ingeborg Barisic; Maria Loane; Ester Garne; Helen Dolk
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2011-03-07

Review 9.  Paper 3: EUROCAT data quality indicators for population-based registries of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Maria Loane; Helen Dolk; Ester Garne; Ruth Greenlees
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2011-03-07

10.  Chromosome abnormalities and spontaneous fetal death following amniocentesis: further data and associations with maternal age.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  80 in total

1.  Screening key genes associated with congenital heart defects in Down syndrome based on differential expression network.

Authors:  Shan Yu; Huani Yi; Zhimin Wang; Juan Dong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  To NIPT or Not to NIPT.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-09-12

3.  Parental age and childhood cancer risk: A Danish population-based registry study.

Authors:  Zuelma A Contreras; Johnni Hansen; Beate Ritz; Jorn Olsen; Fei Yu; Julia E Heck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Germline mosaicism does not explain the maternal age effect on trisomy.

Authors:  Ross Rowsey; Anna Kashevarova; Brenda Murdoch; Carrie Dickenson; Tracey Woodruff; Edith Cheng; Patricia Hunt; Terry Hassold
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Bone mineral density in adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  A Carfì; R Liperoti; D Fusco; S Giovannini; V Brandi; D L Vetrano; E Meloni; D Mascia; E R Villani; E Manes Gravina; R Bernabei; G Onder
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.

Authors:  Evie Kendal
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.352

7.  Trends in maternal age distribution and the live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in England and Wales: 1938-2010.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Joan K Morris
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Trisomy 13 and 18-Prevalence and mortality-A multi-registry population based analysis.

Authors:  Nitin Goel; Joan K Morris; David Tucker; Hermien E K de Walle; Marian K Bakker; Vijaya Kancherla; Lisa Marengo; Mark A Canfield; Karin Kallen; Nathalie Lelong; Jorge L Camelo; Erin B Stallings; Abbey M Jones; Amy Nance; My-Phuong Huynh; Maria-Luisa Martínez-Fernández; Antonin Sipek; Anna Pierini; Wendy N Nembhard; Dorit Goetz; Anke Rissmann; Boris Groisman; Leonora Luna-Muñoz; Elena Szabova; Serhiy Lapchenko; Ignacio Zarante; Paula Hurtado-Villa; Laura E Martinez; Giovanna Tagliabue; Danielle Landau; Miriam Gatt; Saeed Dastgiri; Margery Morgan
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  The Foundation in Evidence of Medical and Dental Telephone Consultations.

Authors:  Martina Albrecht; Florian Isenbeck; Jüürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  A population-based study of prevalence of Down syndrome in Southern Thailand.

Authors:  Somchit Jaruratanasirikul; Ounjai Kor-Anantakul; Montira Chowvichian; Wannee Limpitikul; Pathikan Dissaneevate; Nitthakarn Intharasangkanawin; Atchara Sattapanyo; Sermsri Pathompanitrat; H Sriplung
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.764

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.