Literature DB >> 16633220

Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations.

Christoph Kniestedt1, Shan Lin, Joyce Choe, Michelle Nee, Alan Bostrom, Jörg Stürmer, Robert L Stamper.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the correlation of central corneal thickness (CCT) to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT, PASCAL), and to glaucoma stage as assessed by cup-to-disc ratio (CDR).
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional tricenter observation study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From three glaucoma specialty practices a sample of 406 independent eyes was included. After ultrasound pachymetry, intraocular pressure was measured using PASCAL and Goldmann applanation tonometry and cup-to-disc ration was reassessed. Demographic data were included in the multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Mean corneal thickness was 540 microm. African Americans and normal-tension glaucoma patients showed the lowest values (518 microm and 522 microm, respectively). These values were significantly thinner than the central corneal thickness of Caucasians (549 microm) and ocular hypertensives (564 microm). Intraocular pressure assessed by Goldmann applanation tonometry shows a significant correlation with central corneal thickness (r = 0.068, P < 0.001), whereas PASCAL is not significantly associated with central corneal thickness (r < 0.001, P = 0.997). Increased IOP is significantly correlated with large ocular pulse amplitudes (r = 0.13, P < 0.001), which is predominantly seen in ocular hypertensives. A significant negative correlation was detected between cup-to-disc ratio and central corneal thickness (r = 0.102, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Glaucoma patients with thin central corneal thickness are more likely to be found at an advanced stage of the disease and among those with normal-tension glaucoma and black African ancestry. Underestimation of intraocular pressure by Goldmann applanation tonometry could be one causative factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633220     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200604000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis of central corneal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma cases in the NEIGHBOR and GLAUGEN consortia.

Authors:  Megan Ulmer; Jun Li; Brian L Yaspan; Ayse Bilge Ozel; Julia E Richards; Sayoko E Moroi; Felicia Hawthorne; Donald L Budenz; David S Friedman; Douglas Gaasterland; Jonathan Haines; Jae H Kang; Richard Lee; Paul Lichter; Yutao Liu; Louis R Pasquale; Margaret Pericak-Vance; Anthony Realini; Joel S Schuman; Kuldev Singh; Douglas Vollrath; Robert Weinreb; Gadi Wollstein; Donald J Zack; Kang Zhang; Terri Young; R Rand Allingham; Janey L Wiggs; Allison Ashley-Koch; Michael A Hauser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Central corneal thickness as a predictor of visual field loss in primary open angle glaucoma for a Hispanic population.

Authors:  Jorge L Fernandez-Bahamonde; Christian Roman-Rodriguez; Maria C Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.975

Review 3.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Comparison of the iCare tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in Malawi].

Authors:  J Hohmann; M Schulze-Schwering; T Chirambo Nyaka; V Moyo; P C Kayange; D Doycheva; N H Batumba; M S Spitzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 6.  The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma.

Authors:  Graham W Belovay; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus].

Authors:  N Schädle; J D Unterlauft; T Klink; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Central corneal thickness in black Cameroonian ocular hypertensive and glaucomatous subjects.

Authors:  Christelle Domngang Noche; André Omgbwa Eballe; Assumpta Lucienne Bella
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-24

Review 9.  Graft failure: III. Glaucoma escalation after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Emily C Greenlee; Young H Kwon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 10.  Clinical characteristics and current treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  Laura P Cohen; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.