Literature DB >> 19953296

Statistical test of VEP waveform equality.

Rockefeller S L Young1, Eiji Kimura.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to describe a theory and method for inferring the statistical significance of a visually evoked cortical potential (VEP) recording. The statistical evaluation is predicated on the pre-stimulus VEP as estimates of the cortical potentials expected when the stimulus does not produce an effect, a mathematical transform to convert the voltages into standard deviations from zero, and a time-series approach for estimating the variability of between-session VEPs under the null hypothesis. Empirical and Monte Carlo analyses address issues concerned with testability, statistical validity, clinical feasibility, as well as limitations of the proposed method. We conclude that visual electrophysiological recordings can be evaluated as a statistical study of n = 1 subject using time-series analysis when confounding effects are adequately controlled. The statistical test can be performed on either a single VEP or the difference between pairs of VEPs.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953296     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-009-9207-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  Resampling approach to statistical inference: bootstrapping from event-related potentials data.

Authors:  F Di Nocera; F Ferlazzo
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-17

3.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Colin Barber; Mitchell Brigell; Michael F Marmor; Alma Patrizia Tormene; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients.

Authors:  M Bach; J P Maurer; M E Wolf
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo comparison of the sensitivity of different methods.

Authors:  A Achim
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11

6.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials.

Authors:  R C Blair; W Karniski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Statistical inference from N--1 experiments.

Authors:  E S Edgington
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1967-03

8.  The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C Rodarte; D C Hood; E B Yang; T Grippo; V C Greenstein; J M Liebmann; R Ritch
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Effects of loratadine and cetirizine on actual driving and psychometric test performance, and EEG during driving.

Authors:  J G Ramaekers; M M Uiterwijk; J F O'Hanlon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  A comparison of signal detection techniques in the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Tom Wright; Josefin Nilsson; Christina Gerth; Carol Westall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of spectral filters on VEP and alpha-wave responses.

Authors:  Kevin T Willeford; Vanessa Fimreite; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-08-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.