Literature DB >> 21359880

Endoscopic access to and exploration of the lesser sac in a human cadaver model: opportunity for transgastric endoscopic pancreatic surgery (with video).

B Joseph Elmunzer1, Christopher J Sonnenday, Jason R Taylor, Joseph P Furlan, Steve J Schomisch, James M Scheiman, Amitabh Chak, Jeffrey M Marks, Jeffrey L Ponsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transgastric endoscopy may represent a viable platform for diagnostic and therapeutic pancreatic interventions with reduced morbidity. In a human cadaver model, we aimed to determine the feasibility of transgastric endoscopic access to the lesser sac, creation of an adequate working space within the lesser sac, and reliable identification of lesser sac anatomic structures.
METHODS: In six human cadavers, endoscopic guidance was used to determine an appropriate access site to the lesser sac. Subsequently, endosonographic guidance was used to introduce an aspiration needle into the potential space between the stomach and the pancreas. After creating a fluid cushion and dilating the needle tract, an endoscope was advanced through the gastrotomy into the lesser sac and air insufflation was used to create a working space. Predetermined anatomic structures were systematically sought and marked when recognized. In the final two cadavers, endoscopic closure of the access site was performed.
RESULTS: All six procedures were successful in achieving access to the lesser sac and establishing an adequate working space. The access sites appeared amenable to endoscopic closure. Reliable organ identification, however, was not achieved in all cases, representing one of the immediate barriers to clinical application.
CONCLUSIONS: Transgastric endoscopic access to the lesser sac can be achieved reliably and an adequate working space can be established. Additional research addressing endoscopic orientation and organ recognition within the lesser sac is necessary. The immediate potential applications of this approach include differentiating benign from malignant pancreatic pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21359880     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1607-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Sheldon Randall; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  H P Knaebel; M K Diener; M N Wente; M W Büchler; C M Seiler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy.

Authors:  L M Brunt; J C Langer; M A Quasebarth; E D Whitman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  J Rubén Rodríguez; Santos Soto Germes; Pari V Pandharipande; G Scott Gazelle; Sarah P Thayer; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-04

5.  Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study).

Authors:  H Seifert; M Biermer; W Schmitt; C Jürgensen; U Will; R Gerlach; C Kreitmair; A Meining; T Wehrmann; T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  D H Park; S S Lee; S-H Moon; S Y Choi; S W Jung; D W Seo; S K Lee; M-H Kim
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 10.093

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  On the suitability of Thiel cadavers for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): surgical training, feasibility studies, and anatomical education.

Authors:  Andrea Porzionato; Lino Polese; Emanuele Lezoche; Veronica Macchi; Giovanni Lezoche; Gianfranco Da Dalt; Carla Stecco; Lorenzo Norberto; Stefano Merigliano; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.