Literature DB >> 15006886

Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Bertrand Suc1, Simon Msika, Massimo Piccinini, Gilles Fourtanier, Jean-Marie Hay, Yves Flamant, Abe Fingerhut, Pierre-Louis Fagniez, Jacques Chipponi.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Prophylactic administration of octreotide acetate decreases the rate of postoperative intra-abdominal complications (IACs) after elective pancreatic resection.
DESIGN: Single-blind, controlled, randomized trial.
SETTING: Multicenter (N = 20) trial in France. PATIENTS: Of 230 randomized patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy and pancreatic enteric anastomosis or distal pancreatectomy for either malignant or benign tumor or chronic pancreatitis, 122 were allotted intraoperatively to receive octreotide; 108 served as controls.
RESULTS: All 230 patients were analyzed. Both groups were comparable except that significantly more patients in the octreotide group had biological glue injected into the main pancreatic duct alone (P<.001) or reinforcing the pancreatic enteric anastomosis (68% [83/122] vs 39% [42/108]; P =.002). Fewer patients (P =.08) in the octreotide group sustained 1 or more IACs (22% vs 32%). In subgroup analysis, octreotide significantly reduced the rate of patients sustaining 1 or more IACs when the main pancreatic duct diameter was less than 3 mm (P<.02), when pancreatojejunostomy was performed (P<.02), or both (P<.02). No significant differences were found regarding IAC severity. Twenty-three patients (10%) died postoperatively, 16 (70% of deaths) of whom had 1 or more IACs. The only independent risk factor for IACs found on multivariate analysis was pancreatoduodenectomy compared with distal pancreatectomy (P<.01) (odds ratio, 3.54 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-8.65]).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that octreotide is not necessary for all patients undergoing pancreatic resection; it could be useful when the main pancreatic duct is less than 3 mm in diameter and when pancreatoduodenectomy is completed by pancreatojejunostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15006886     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.3.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  49 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Hans F Schoellhammer; Yuman Fong; Singh Gagandeep
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Peri-operative outcomes for pancreatoduodenectomy in India: a multi-centric study.

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto; Mms Bedi; N Bheerappa; Adarsh Chaudhary; Md Gandhi; M Jacob; S Jesvanth; Dg Kannan; Vinay K Kapoor; A Kumar; Kk Maudar; Hariharan Ramesh; Ra Sastry; Rajan Saxena; Ajit Sewkani; S Sharma; Shailesh V Shrikhande; A Singh; Rajneesh K Singh; R Surendran; Subodh Varshney; V Verma; V Vimalraj
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Rahul S Koti; Kurinchi S Gurusamy; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Is Sutureless Pancreaticogastrostomy More Effective than Single-Layer Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Daniel Kostov; Georgi Kobakov
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2017-06

6.  Incidence and management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Steve M M de Castro; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Olivier R C Busch; Otto M van Delden; Johan S Laméris; Thomas M van Gulik; Hugo Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial?

Authors:  Marco Pericoli Ridolfini; Sergio Alfieri; Stavros Gourgiotis; Dario Di Miceli; Fabio Rotondi; Giuseppe Quero; Roberta Manghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Long-term assessments after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreatic duct invagination anastomosis.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Fujino; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Ippei Matsumoto; Tetsuya Sakai; Tetsuo Ajiki; Takashi Ueda; Yoshikazu Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.