Literature DB >> 16615330

The subjective size of melodic intervals over a two-octave range.

Frank A Russo1, William Forde Thompson.   

Abstract

Musically trained and untrained participants provided magnitude estimates of the size of melodic intervals. Each interval was formed by a sequence of two pitches that differed by between 50 cents (one half of a semitone) and 2,400 cents (two octaves) and was presented in a high or a low pitch register and in an ascending or a descending direction. Estimates were larger for intervals in the high pitch register than for those in the low pitch register and for descending intervals than for ascending intervals. Ascending intervals were perceived as larger than descending intervals when presented in a high pitch register, but descending intervals were perceived as larger than ascending intervals when presented in a low pitch register. For intervals up to an octave in size, differentiation of intervals was greater for trained listeners than for untrained listeners. We discuss the implications for psychophysical pitch scales and models of music perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615330     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Rhythm and pitch in music cognition.

Authors:  C L Krumhansl
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The scaling of pitch by the method of magnitude-estimation.

Authors:  J BECK; W A SHAW
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1961-06

3.  The Mel Scale's disqualifying bias and a consistency of pitch-difference equisections in 1956 with equal cochlear distances and equal frequency ratios.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  [Disrupting the isochrony underlying rhythm: an asymmetry in discrimination].

Authors:  J J Bharucha; J H Pryor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

5.  Dynamic pattern structure in music: recent theory and research.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-06

6.  Music recognition.

Authors:  D Deutsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  An interval size illusion: the influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals.

Authors:  Frank A Russo; William Forde Thompson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-05

8.  Frequency and frequency-ratio resolution by possessors of absolute and relative pitch: examples of categorical perception.

Authors:  E M Burns; S L Campbell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Categorical perception--phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals.

Authors:  E M Burns; W D Ward
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The perceptual basis of judgments of pitch differences and pitch ratios.

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker; E G Upenieks
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of the extended MNS in emotional and nonemotional judgments of human song.

Authors:  Lucy M McGarry; Jaime A Pineda; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Psychometric functions for pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Megan E Masterson; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Naturally together: pitch-height and brightness as coupled factors for eliciting the SMARC effect in non-musicians.

Authors:  Marco Pitteri; Mauro Marchetti; Konstantinos Priftis; Massimo Grassi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Audiovisual Interval Size Estimation Is Associated with Early Musical Training.

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Abel; H Charles Li; Frank A Russo; Gottfried Schlaug; Psyche Loui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pitch contour impairment in congenital amusia: New insights from the Self-paced Audio-visual Contour Task (SACT).

Authors:  Xuejing Lu; Yanan Sun; Hao Tam Ho; William Forde Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Musical training shapes neural responses to melodic and prosodic expectation.

Authors:  Ioanna Zioga; Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Mismatch negativity reflects asymmetric pre-attentive harmonic interval discrimination.

Authors:  Luise Wagner; Torsten Rahne; Stefan K Plontke; Nico Heidekrüger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.