Literature DB >> 16612892

The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating.

Sergey Gavrilets1, Takehiko I Hayashi.   

Abstract

We consider mathematical models describing the evolutionary consequences of antagonistic interactions between male offence, male defence and female reproductive tract and physiology in controlling female mating rate. Overall, the models support previous verbal arguments about the possibility of continuous coevolutionary chase between the sexes driven by two-way (e.g. between male offence and female traits) and three-way (e.g. between male offence, male defence and female traits) inter-sexual antagonistic interactions. At the same time, the models clarify these arguments by identifying various additional potential evolutionary dynamics and important parameters (e.g. genetic variances, female optimum mating rates, strength of selection in females and the relative contributions of first and second males into offspring) and emphasizing the importance of initial conditions. Models also show that sexual conflict can result in the evolution of monandry in an initially polyandrous species and in the evolution of random mating in a population initially exhibiting non-random mating.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612892      PMCID: PMC1569609          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  19 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

3.  Clutch size evolution under sexual conflict enhances the stability of mating systems.

Authors:  H G Smith; R Härdling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual conflict and protein polymorphism.

Authors:  Ralph Haygood
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition.

Authors:  P Stockley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 9.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Continual change in mate preferences.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Rapid evolution of plethodontid modulating factor, a hypervariable salamander courtship pheromone, is driven by positive selection.

Authors:  Catherine A Palmer; Richard A Watts; Amy P Hastings; Lynne D Houck; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm?

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell; T Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Sexual conflict in its ecological setting.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Temporally variable selection on proteolysis-related reproductive tract proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Michael Turchin; Mariana F Wolfner; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Thomas C Nelson; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Selection on the Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp62F.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Howard Rundle
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.