Literature DB >> 16609024

Bead-based ELISA for validation of ovarian cancer early detection markers.

Nathalie Scholler1, Meghan Crawford, Alicia Sato, Charles W Drescher, Kathy C O'Briant, Nancy Kiviat, Garnet L Anderson, Nicole Urban.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Efforts to validate ovarian cancer early detection biomarkers with immunoassays are challenged by the limited specimen volumes available. We sought to develop a specimen-efficient assay to measure CA125 in serum, assess its reproducibility, validity, and performance, and test its potential for multiplexing and combining with human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), a promising novel ovarian cancer marker. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Four pairs of commercially available anti-CA125 antibodies and one pair of anti-HE4 antibodies were evaluated for accuracy in measuring known concentrations of antigen on a bead-based platform. The two best pairs were further assessed for reproducibility, validity, and the ability to discriminate between blinded serum samples obtained from ovarian cancer cases (n = 66) and women without ovarian cancer (n = 125).
RESULTS: Suitability for use in a bead-based assay varied across CA125 antibody pairs. Two CA125 bead-based assays were highly reproducible (overall correlations between replicates >/= 0.95; coefficients of variation < 0.2) and strongly correlated with the research standard CA125II RIA (correlations >/= 0.9). Their ability to distinguish ovarian cancer cases from non-cases based on receiver operating characteristic analyses (area under the curve, AUC, of 0.85 and 0.84) was close to that of the CA125II RIA (AUC, 0.87). The HE4 bead-based assay showed lower reproducibility but yielded an AUC of 0.89 in receiver operating characteristics analysis. Multiplexing was not possible but a composite marker including CA125 and HE4 achieved an AUC of 0.91.
CONCLUSION: Optimization procedures yielded two bead-based assays for CA125 that perform comparably to the standard CA125II RIA, which could be combined with an HE4 bead-based assay to improve diagnostic performance, and requires only 15 muL of sample each.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16609024      PMCID: PMC2734269          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  34 in total

Review 1.  Multiplexed particle-based flow cytometric assays.

Authors:  D A Vignali
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Factors influencing serum CA125II levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D K Pauler; U Menon; M McIntosh; H L Symecko; S J Skates; I J Jacobs
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Joann Manson; Robert Wallace; Bernedine Lund; Dallas Hall; Scott Davis; Sally Shumaker; Ching-Yun Wang; Evan Stein; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Preoperative tumor marker CA125 levels in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer stage.

Authors:  R Fures; D Buković; B Hodek; B Klarić; R Herman; G Grubisić
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  1999-06

5.  Generating longitudinal screening algorithms using novel biomarkers for disease.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Nicole Urban; Beth Karlan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial: incidence of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality during 6-year follow-up after stopping beta-carotene and retinol supplements.

Authors:  Gary E Goodman; Mark D Thornquist; John Balmes; Mark R Cullen; Frank L Meyskens; Gilbert S Omenn; Barbara Valanis; James H Williams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Potential markers that complement expression of CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Daniel G Rosen; Lin Wang; J Neeley Atkinson; Yinhua Yu; Karen H Lu; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Ingegerd Hellstrom; Samuel C Mok; Jinsong Liu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  CA 125 in gynecological pathology--a review.

Authors:  P Kenemans; C A Yedema; G G Bon; S von Mensdorff-Pouilly
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 9.  CA 125: the past and the future.

Authors:  R C Bast; F J Xu; Y H Yu; S Barnhill; Z Zhang; G B Mills
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.248

Review 10.  Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ian J Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  43 in total

1.  N-linked glycan structures and their expressions change in the blood sera of ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  William R Alley; Jacqueline A Vasseur; John A Goetz; Martin Svoboda; Benjamin F Mann; Daniela E Matei; Nancy Menning; Ahmed Hussein; Yehia Mechref; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Method for generation of in vivo biotinylated recombinant antibodies by yeast mating.

Authors:  Nathalie Scholler; Barbara Garvik; Travis Quarles; Shaoyi Jiang; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  CA125 in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nathalie Scholler; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.851

5.  Splice variant HE4-V3 expression is associated with favorable prognosis in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Keita Tokuishi; Shin-ichi Yamashita; Kazuyuki Ohbo; Katsunobu Kawahara
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-10-21

6.  Does HE4 have a role as biomarker in the recurrence of ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Francesco Plotti; Stella Capriglione; Corrado Terranova; Roberto Montera; Alessia Aloisi; Patrizio Damiani; Ludovico Muzii; Giuseppe Scaletta; Pierluigi Benedetti-Panici; Roberto Angioli
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-08-09

Review 7.  Recent advancements in fabrication of nanomaterial based biosensors for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Rinky Sha; Sushmee Badhulika
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.833

8.  Use of yeast-secreted in vivo biotinylated recombinant antibodies (Biobodies) in bead-based ELISA.

Authors:  Nathalie Scholler; Kimberly A Lowe; Lindsay A Bergan; Archana V Kampani; Vivian Ng; Robin M Forrest; Jason D Thorpe; Jenny A Gross; Barbara M Garvik; Ronny Drapkin; Garnet L Anderson; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Profiling lipid-protein interactions using nonquenched fluorescent liposomal nanovesicles and proteome microarrays.

Authors:  Kuan-Yi Lu; Sheng-Ce Tao; Tzu-Ching Yang; Yu-Hsuan Ho; Chia-Hsien Lee; Chen-Ching Lin; Hsueh-Fen Juan; Hsuan-Cheng Huang; Chin-Yu Yang; Ming-Shuo Chen; Yu-Yi Lin; Jin-Ying Lu; Heng Zhu; Chien-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Martin McIntosh; Lieling Wu; Matt Barnett; Gary Goodman; Jason D Thorpe; Lindsay Bergan; Mark D Thornquist; Nathalie Scholler; Nam Kim; Kathy O'Briant; Charles Drescher; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.