Literature DB >> 14764655

Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Ian J Jacobs1, Usha Menon.   

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is characterize by few early symptoms, presentation at an advanced stage, and poor survival. As a result, it is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological cancer. During the last decade, a research effort has been directed toward improving outcomes for ovarian cancer by screening for preclinical, early stage disease using both imaging techniques and serum markers. Numerous biomarkers have shown potential in samples from clinically diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, but few have been thoroughly assessed in preclinical disease and screening. The most thoroughly investigated biomarker in ovarian cancer screening is CA125. Prospective studies have demonstrated that both CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound can detect a significant proportion of preclinical ovarian cancers, and refinements in interpretation of results have improved sensitivity and reduced the false-positive rate of screening. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from ovarian cancer is still unclear. Prospective studies of screening are in progress in both the general population and high-risk population, including the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), a randomized trial involving 200,000 postmenopausal women designed to document the impact of screening on mortality. Recent advances in technology for the study of the serum proteome offer exciting opportunities for the identification of novel biomarkers or patterns of markers that will have greater sensitivity and lead time for preclinical disease than CA125. Considerable interest and controversy has been generated by initial results utilizing surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) in ovarian cancer. There are challenging issues related to the design of studies to evaluate SELDI and other proteomic technology, as well as the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of this new technology. Large serum banks such as that assembled in UKCTOCS, which contain preclinical samples from patients who later developed ovarian cancer and other disorders, provide a unique resource for carefully designed studies of proteomic technology. There is a sound basis for optimism that further developments in serum proteomic analysis will provide powerful methods for screening in ovarian cancer and many other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14764655     DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R400006-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  121 in total

Review 1.  Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.

Authors:  Brian M Nolen; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 2.  Integrating high-throughput technologies in the quest for effective biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Vathany Kulasingam; Maria P Pavlou; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  New serum biomarkers for detection of esophageal carcinoma using Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Renyong Guo; Chunqin Pan; Jianmin Shen; Chibo Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Discrimination analysis of mass spectrometry proteomics for cervical cancer detection.

Authors:  Chibo Liu; Chunqin Pan; Jianmin Shen; Haibao Wang; Liang Yong; Richu Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  The influence of birth cohort and calendar period on global trends in ovarian cancer incidence.

Authors:  Citadel J Cabasag; Melina Arnold; John Butler; Manami Inoue; Britton Trabert; Penelope M Webb; Freddie Bray; Isabelle Soerjomataram
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Symptom triggered screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot study of feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Barbara A Goff; Kimberly A Lowe; Jeannette C Kane; Marissa D Robertson; Marcia A Gaul; M Robyn Andersen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Dielectrophoretic differentiation of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts using contactless dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Alireza Salmanzadeh; Harsha Kittur; Michael B Sano; Paul C Roberts; Eva M Schmelz; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  Contemporary progress in ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  Christine S Walsh; B Y Karlan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Proteomic contributions to personalized cancer care.

Authors:  John M Koomen; Eric B Haura; Gerold Bepler; Rebecca Sutphen; Elizabeth R Remily-Wood; Kaaron Benson; Mohamad Hussein; Lori A Hazlehurst; Timothy J Yeatman; Lynne T Hildreth; Thomas A Sellers; Paul B Jacobsen; David A Fenstermacher; William S Dalton
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 10.  Proteomic profiling in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey Kim; Lucas Minig; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.