Literature DB >> 10228898

CA 125: the past and the future.

R C Bast1, F J Xu, Y H Yu, S Barnhill, Z Zhang, G B Mills.   

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, substantial progress has been made in understanding the potential and the limitations of the CA 125 assay. More than 2000 papers have been published concerning laboratory and clinical studies of CA 125. The original CA 125 assay utilized the OC 125 antibody that recognizes the CA 125 epitope on a high molecular weight glycoprotein. Despite repeated attempts, the gene encoding the peptide component has not yet been cloned. Monoclonal antibodies have been raised against other epitopes expressed by this molecule, leading to the development of the CA 125-II assay that exhibits less day-to-day variation. Using either assay, elevated levels of CA 125 are detected in a number of benign conditions, including endometriosis. CA 125 is most consistently elevated in epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be expressed in a number of gynecologic (endometrial, fallopian tube) and non-gynecologic (pancreatic, breast, colon and lung) cancers. The best established application of the CA 125 assay is in monitoring ovarian cancer. The rate of decline in CA 125 during primary chemotherapy has been an important independent prognostic factor in several multivariate analyses. Persistent elevation of CA 125 at the time of a second look surgical surveillance procedure predicts residual disease with > 95% specificity. Rising CA 125 values have preceded clinical detection of recurrent disease by at least 3 months in most, but not all studies. Given the modest activity of salvage chemotherapy, this information has not yet impacted on survival. Rising CA 125 during subsequent chemotherapy has been associated with progressive disease in more than 90% of cases. CA 125 may serve as an effective surrogate marker for clinical response in phase II trials of new drugs. CA 125 levels can aid in distinguishing malignant from benign pelvic masses, permitting effective triage of patients for primary surgery. Early detection of ovarian cancer remains the most promising application of CA 125. An algorithm has been developed that estimates the risk of ovarian cancer (ROC) based upon the level and trend of CA 125 values. A major trial has been initiated that uses the ROC algorithm to trigger transvaginal sonography and/or subsequent laparotomy. Such a trial could demonstrate improvement in survival through early detection. This strategy should provide adequate specificity, but sensitivity for early stage disease may not be optimal. In the future, improved sensitivity may be attained using multiple markers and neural network analysis. Most serum tumor markers have been proteins or carbohydrates, but lipid markers such as lysophosphatidic acid deserve evaluation. Genomic and proteonomic technologies should identify additional novel markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10228898     DOI: 10.1177/172460089801300402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   3.248


  102 in total

Review 1.  Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.

Authors:  Brian M Nolen; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 2.  Membrane-bound mucins: the mechanistic basis for alterations in the growth and survival of cancer cells.

Authors:  S Bafna; S Kaur; S K Batra
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Lectin chromatography/mass spectrometry discovery workflow identifies putative biomarkers of aggressive breast cancers.

Authors:  Penelope M Drake; Birgit Schilling; Richard K Niles; Akraporn Prakobphol; Bensheng Li; Kwanyoung Jung; Wonryeon Cho; Miles Braten; Halina D Inerowicz; Katherine Williams; Matthew Albertolle; Jason M Held; Demetris Iacovides; Dylan J Sorensen; Obi L Griffith; Eric Johansen; Anna M Zawadzka; Michael P Cusack; Simon Allen; Matthew Gormley; Steven C Hall; H Ewa Witkowska; Joe W Gray; Fred Regnier; Bradford W Gibson; Susan J Fisher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Utilizing spectral counting to quantitatively characterize tandem removal of abundant proteins (TRAP) in human plasma.

Authors:  Christopher M Shuford; Adam M Hawkridge; John C Burnett; David C Muddiman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Clinical potential of mucins in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ajay P Singh; Shantibhusan Senapati; Moorthy P Ponnusamy; Maneesh Jain; Subodh M Lele; John S Davis; Steven Remmenga; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Proteomics in cancer screening and management in gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Weiguo Wu; Ryuji Kobayashi; John J Kavanagh
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Assessment of CA-125 area under the curve as a prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sernaz Uzunoglu; Aysun Aybatlı; Petek Balkanlı Kaplan; Irfan Cicin; Necdet Sut; Cenk Sayın; Fusun Varol
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Breast cancer and protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Lay-Harn Gam
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2012-10-20

9.  An integrated approach utilizing proteomics and bioinformatics to detect ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jie-kai Yu; Shu Zheng; Yong Tang; Li Li
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 10.  Proteomic contributions to personalized cancer care.

Authors:  John M Koomen; Eric B Haura; Gerold Bepler; Rebecca Sutphen; Elizabeth R Remily-Wood; Kaaron Benson; Mohamad Hussein; Lori A Hazlehurst; Timothy J Yeatman; Lynne T Hildreth; Thomas A Sellers; Paul B Jacobsen; David A Fenstermacher; William S Dalton
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.