Literature DB >> 16607374

Low sensitivity of histology to predict the presence of microorganisms in suspected aseptic loosening of a joint prosthesis.

Guillem Bori1, Alex Soriano, Sebastián García, Xavier Gallart, Luis Casanova, Carme Mallofre, Manel Almela, José A Martínez, Josep Riba, Josep Mensa.   

Abstract

Intraoperative histology has a high specificity and sensitivity when a septic prosthesis loosening is suspected. However, its usefulness to predict the presence of microorganisms when aseptic loosening is suspected is not well defined. Intraoperative histology and cultures from periprosthetic tissue of 61 revision arthroplasties performed owing to suspected aseptic loosening were retrospectively reviewed. Frozen sections were evaluated following Mirra's criteria (adapted by Feldman). Culture was considered positive when the same microorganism was isolated in at least two samples. The cultures were positive in 12 cases and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common microorganisms (11 cases). In six out of 12 cases (50%), the histology revealed more than five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of histology to detect the presence of microorganisms was 50, 81, 40 and 86%, respectively. In conclusion, intraoperative histology using Mirra's criteria had a low sensitivity to predict the presence of microorganisms in samples from suspected aseptic prosthetic loosening.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16607374     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  12 in total

1.  [Histopathologic diagnosis of infectious loosening of joint prostheses].

Authors:  I Bos; M Zagorski; C Boos; S Krüger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Prosthesis failure within 2 years of implantation is highly predictive of infection.

Authors:  María Eugenia Portillo; Margarita Salvadó; Albert Alier; Lluisa Sorli; Santos Martínez; Juan Pablo Horcajada; Lluis Puig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes.

Authors:  Stephan W Tohtz; Michael Müller; Lars Morawietz; Tobias Winkler; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  T G Kashima; Y Inagaki; G Grammatopoulos; N A Athanasou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Intra-operative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection can rely on frozen sections in patients without synovial fluid analyses.

Authors:  Chi Xu; Heng Guo; Ji-Ying Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Plasma cell infiltration in a 28-year-old patient with chronic indolent fracture-related tibial infection due to Cutibacterium acnes.

Authors:  Tristan Ferry; Alexis Trecourt; Cecile Batailler; Marie Brevet
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-15

7.  The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Martin McNally; Ricardo Sousa; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker; Antonia F Chen; Alex Soriano; H Charles Vogely; Martin Clauss; Carlos A Higuera; Rihard Trebše
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 8.  Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in implant-associated infections.

Authors:  María Eugenia Portillo; Stéphane Corvec; Olivier Borens; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  One-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements.

Authors:  Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud; Xavier Gallart; Alejandro Soriano
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-06-14

Review 10.  Histopathology in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: When Will the Morphomolecular Diagnosis Be a Reality?

Authors:  G Bori; M A McNally; N Athanasou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.