Literature DB >> 25687172

Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

T G Kashima1, Y Inagaki, G Grammatopoulos, N A Athanasou.   

Abstract

A heavy neutrophil polymorph infiltrate [>5 per high-power field (HPF) after examination of at least 5 HPF by Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria] is characteristically seen in peri-implant tissues of infected prosthetic hip and knee joints. We determined whether chloroacetate esterase (CAE) staining facilitated the identification of neutrophil polymorphs in peri-implant tissues in cases of hip and knee arthroplasty infection and reassessed MSIS criteria in the light of our findings. Frozen and paraffin sections of peri-prosthetic tissues of 76 cases of failed hip and knee arthroplasties classified as septic or aseptic loosening microbiologically were analysed histologically by both haematoxylin-eosin and CAE staining. The extent of the neutrophil polymorph infiltrate was determined semiquantitatively and correlated with the microbiological and clinical diagnosis. CAE staining facilitated identification of neutrophil polymorphs in arthroplasty tissues. All cases of aseptic loosening contained fewer than two neutrophil polymorphs per HPF. CAE staining showed that in some cases of septic loosening, fewer than five neutrophil polymorphs per HPF (on average) are present in peri-prosthetic tissues. The histological criterion of more than two neutrophil polymorphs per HPF showed increased sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of septic loosening. CAE is a useful stain that facilitates the identification of neutrophil polymorphs in both frozen and paraffin sections of peri-implant tissues. CAE staining shows that some microbiologically confirmed cases of septic loosening contain relatively few neutrophil polymorphs, indicating that the MSIS histological criterion of more than five neutrophil polymorphs per HPF is too high an index figure for the diagnosis of all cases of hip and knee arthroplasty infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25687172     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1722-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  31 in total

1.  Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service.

Authors:  R Pandey; A R Berendt; N A Athanasou
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  New definition for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges?

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Sarah Menashe; Robert L Barrack; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes.

Authors:  Stephan W Tohtz; Michael Müller; Lars Morawietz; Tobias Winkler; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J H Lonner; P Desai; P E Dicesare; G Steiner; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-04

7.  Total hip replacement failures. A histological evaluation.

Authors:  C B Charosky; P G Bullough; P D Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Bauer; Javad Parvizi; Naomi Kobayashi; Viktor Krebs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daxes M Banit; Herbert Kaufer; James M Hartford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived?

Authors:  Carl Deirmengian; Keith Kardos; Patrick Kilmartin; Alexander Cameron; Kevin Schiller; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Multifunctional roles of leader protein of foot-and-mouth disease viruses in suppressing host antiviral responses.

Authors:  Yingqi Liu; Zixiang Zhu; Miaotao Zhang; Haixue Zheng
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.683

2.  Correlation of histological and microbiological findings in septic and aseptic knee implant failure.

Authors:  Y Inagaki; Y Uchihara; M Munemoto; M Scarborough; C A F Dodd; C L M H Gibbons; Y Tanaka; N A Athanasou
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Depletion of Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) in Mice Leads to Dysbiosis and Persistent Colonization with Segmented Filamentous Bacteria.

Authors:  Patrick Klüber; Steffen K Meurer; Jessica Lambertz; Roman Schwarz; Silke Zechel-Gran; Till Braunschweig; Sabine Hurka; Eugen Domann; Ralf Weiskirchen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Histopathology in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: When Will the Morphomolecular Diagnosis Be a Reality?

Authors:  G Bori; M A McNally; N Athanasou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.