Literature DB >> 30415463

Intra-operative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection can rely on frozen sections in patients without synovial fluid analyses.

Chi Xu1, Heng Guo1,2, Ji-Ying Chen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether frozen sections can increase diagnostic values of serological tests for the assessment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients without synovial fluid analyses.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 128 revision arthroplasties (79 hips and 49 knees) from January 2016 to December 2017 was performed. Diagnosis of PJI was based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for infection. Three diagnostic models for PJI, with model 1 including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), model 2 including model 1 plus frozen sections > 5 polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)s per high-power field (HPF), and model 3 including model 1 plus frozen sections > 10 PMNs per HPF, were developed. Then receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were compared.
RESULTS: The AUC of model 1, model 2, and model 3 was 79.40% [95% confidence interval (CI), 69.84 to 86.64%], 89.30% (95% CI, 82.93 to 93.92%), and 85.52% (95% CI, 78.44 to 91.4%), respectively. The AUC of model 1 was significantly lower than that of model 2 (p = 0.002) and model 3 (p = 0.039). Although the result was not significant (p = 0.132), there was a trend toward a higher AUC of model 2 than model 3.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that intra-operative frozen sections significantly increased the performance of serum ESR and CRP in the diagnosis of PJI. The combination of serological tests and frozen sections for the assessment of PJI may be reliable in patients without synovial fluid analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; Frozen section histology; Periprosthetic joint infection; Sedimentation rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415463     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4227-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  The 2013 Frank Stinchfield Award: Diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul H Yi; Michael B Cross; Mario Moric; Scott M Sporer; Richard A Berger; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revision surgery: intraoperative frozen section analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Francés Borrego; Fernando Marco Martínez; Juan Luis Cebrian Parra; David Serfaty Grañeda; Rodrigo García Crespo; Luis López-Durán Stern
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz; S Darrin Wilson; M Gavan McAlinden; Min Xu; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Benjamin Zmistowski; Elie F Berbari; Thomas W Bauer; Bryan D Springer; Craig J Della Valle; Kevin L Garvin; Michael A Mont; Montri D Wongworawat; Charalampos G Zalavras
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Have Periprosthetic Hip Infection Rates Plateaued?

Authors:  Dean C Perfetti; Matthew R Boylan; Qais Naziri; Carl B Paulino; Steven M Kurtz; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  C J Della Valle; E Bogner; P Desai; J H Lonner; E Adler; J D Zuckerman; P E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level.

Authors:  B A McArthur; M P Abdel; M J Taunton; D R Osmon; A D Hanssen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Are We Winning or Losing the Battle With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Trends in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Risk for the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund C Lau; Min-Sun Son; Ellen T Chang; Werner Zimmerli; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daxes M Banit; Herbert Kaufer; James M Hartford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improved diagnostic accuracy with the classification tree method for diagnosing low-grade periprosthetic joint infections by quantitative measurement of synovial fluid alpha-defensin and C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Peter Savov; Tilman Calliess; Henning Windhagen; Ralf Lichtinghagen; Alexander Lukasz; Mohamed Omar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.