Literature DB >> 16606864

Delayed hyperenhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of left ventricular hypertrophy caused by aortic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: visualisation of focal fibrosis.

K Debl1, B Djavidani, S Buchner, C Lipke, W Nitz, S Feuerbach, G Riegger, A Luchner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the extent and distribution of focal fibrosis by gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; delayed hyperenhancement) in severe left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in patients with pressure overload caused by aortic stenosis (AS) and with genetically determined hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
METHODS: 44 patients with symptomatic valvular AS (n = 22) and HCM (n = 22) were studied. Cine images were acquired with fast imaging with steady-state precession (trueFISP) on a 1.5 T scanner (Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions). Gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI was performed with a segmented inversion-recovery sequence. The location, extent and enhancement pattern of hyperenhanced myocardium was analysed in a 12-segment model.
RESULTS: Mean LV mass was 238.6 (SD 75.3) g in AS and 205.4 (SD 80.5) g in HCM (p = 0.17). Hyperenhancement was observed in 27% of patients with AS and in 73% of patients with HCM (p < 0.01). In AS, hyperenhancement was observed in 60% of patients with a maximum diastolic wall thickness >or= 18 mm, whereas no patient with a maximum diastolic wall thickness < 18 mm had hyperenhancement (p < 0.05). Patients with hyperenhancement had more severe AS than patients without hyperenhancement (aortic valve area 0.80 (0.09) cm(2)v 0.99 (0.3) cm(2), p < 0.05; maximum gradient 98 (22) mm Hg v 74 (24) mm Hg, p < 0.05). In HCM, hyperenhancement was predominant in the anteroseptal regions and patients with hyperenhancement had higher end diastolic (125.4 (36.9) ml v 98.8 (16.9) ml, p < 0.05) and end systolic volumes (38.9 (18.2) ml v 25.2 (1.7) ml, p < 0.05). The volume of hyperenhancement (percentage of total LV myocardium), where present, was lower in AS than in HCM (4.3 (1.9)% v 8.6 (7.4)%, p< 0.05). Hyperenhancement was observed in 4.5 (3.1) and 4.6 (2.7) segments in AS and HCM, respectively (p = 0.93), and the enhancement pattern was mostly patchy with multiple foci.
CONCLUSIONS: Focal scarring can be observed in severe LV hypertrophy caused by AS and HCM, and correlates with the severity of LV remodelling. However, focal scarring is significantly less prevalent in adaptive LV hypertrophy caused by AS than in genetically determined HCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16606864      PMCID: PMC1861032          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.079392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  21 in total

1.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kurt Debl; Behrus Djavidani; Johannes Seitz; Wolfgang Nitz; Franz-Xaver Schmid; Frank Muders; Stefan Buchner; Stefan Feuerbach; Günter Riegger; Andreas Luchner
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Relation between myocyte disarray and outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  A M Varnava; P M Elliott; N Mahon; M J Davies; W J McKenna
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the interrelation of disarray, fibrosis, and small vessel disease.

Authors:  A M Varnava; P M Elliott; S Sharma; W J McKenna; M J Davies
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Progression from compensated hypertrophy to failure in the pressure-overloaded human heart: structural deterioration and compensatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Stefan Hein; Eyal Arnon; Sawa Kostin; Markus Schönburg; Albrecht Elsässer; Victoria Polyakova; Erwin P Bauer; Wolf-Peter Klövekorn; Jutta Schaper
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Matthias Regenfus; Michele Parker; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Surgical pathology of subaortic septal myectomy associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A study of 204 cases (1996-2000).

Authors:  Geoffrey T Lamke; Rachel D Allen; William D Edwards; Henry D Tazelaar; Gordon K Danielson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.185

Review 8.  Cardiac remodeling--concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling.

Authors:  J N Cohn; R Ferrari; N Sharpe
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate, and late after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  H P Krayenbuehl; O M Hess; E S Monrad; J Schneider; G Mall; M Turina
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards?

Authors:  Anna S John; Thorsten Dill; Roland R Brandt; Matthias Rau; Wolfgang Ricken; Georg Bachmann; Christian W Hamm
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Cytostatic drugs, neuregulin activation of erbB receptors, and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Nadia Hedhli; Kerry Strong Russell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Cell therapy for heart failure: a comprehensive overview of experimental and clinical studies, current challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Santosh K Sanganalmath; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  Identifying the etiology: a systematic approach using delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Annamalai Senthilkumar; Maulik D Majmudar; Chetan Shenoy; Han W Kim; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.179

4.  Impact of secondary hyperparathyroidism on ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in hemodialysis-dependent patients.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Takami; Kazuyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance identifies postinfarction myocardial fibrosis and the border zone at the near cellular level in ex vivo rat heart.

Authors:  Erik B Schelbert; Li-Yueh Hsu; Stasia A Anderson; Bibhu D Mohanty; Syed M Karim; Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  Evolving anatomic, functional, and molecular imaging in the early detection and prognosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Valentin Fuster; Sarina van der Zee; Marc A Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Nathan Mewton; Chia Ying Liu; Pierre Croisille; David Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals typical patterns of myocardial injury in patients with various forms of non-ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Steffen Bohl; Ralf Wassmuth; Hassan Abdel-Aty; André Rudolph; Daniel Messroghli; Rainer Dietz; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Influence of myocardial fibrosis on left ventricular diastolic function: noninvasive assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance and echo.

Authors:  Antonella Moreo; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Benedetta De Chiara; Min Pu; Tam Tran; Francesco Mauri; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 10.  The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of severe aortic stenosis and in post-procedural evaluation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Tarique Al Musa; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.