BACKGROUND: Fibrosis is a common end point of many pathological processes affecting the myocardium and may alter myocardial relaxation properties. By measuring myocardial fibrosis with cardiac magnetic resonance and diastolic function with Doppler echocardiography, we sought to define the influence of fibrosis on left ventricular diastolic function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred four eligible subjects from 252 consecutive subjects undergoing late postgadolinium myocardial enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography were investigated. Subjects with normal diastolic function exhibited no or minimal fibrosis (median LGE score, 0; interquartile range, 0 to 0). In contrast, the majority of patients with cardiomyopathy (regardless of underlying cause) had abnormal diastolic function indices and substantial fibrosis (median LGE score, 3; interquartile range, 0 to 6.25). Prevalence of LGE positivity by diastolic filling pattern was 13% in normal, 48% in impaired relaxation, 78% in pseudonormal, and 87% in restrictive filling (P<0.0001). Similarly, LGE score was significantly higher in patients with deceleration time <150 ms (P<0.012), and it progressively increased with increasing left ventricular filling pressure estimated by tissue Doppler imaging-derived E/E' (P<0.0001). After multivariate analysis, LGE remained significantly correlated with degree of diastolic dysfunction (P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Severity of myocardial fibrosis by LGE significantly correlates with the degree of diastolic dysfunction in a broad range of cardiac conditions. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of left ventricular diastolic function and therapeutic response.
BACKGROUND:Fibrosis is a common end point of many pathological processes affecting the myocardium and may alter myocardial relaxation properties. By measuring myocardial fibrosis with cardiac magnetic resonance and diastolic function with Doppler echocardiography, we sought to define the influence of fibrosis on left ventricular diastolic function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred four eligible subjects from 252 consecutive subjects undergoing late postgadolinium myocardial enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography were investigated. Subjects with normal diastolic function exhibited no or minimal fibrosis (median LGE score, 0; interquartile range, 0 to 0). In contrast, the majority of patients with cardiomyopathy (regardless of underlying cause) had abnormal diastolic function indices and substantial fibrosis (median LGE score, 3; interquartile range, 0 to 6.25). Prevalence of LGE positivity by diastolic filling pattern was 13% in normal, 48% in impaired relaxation, 78% in pseudonormal, and 87% in restrictive filling (P<0.0001). Similarly, LGE score was significantly higher in patients with deceleration time <150 ms (P<0.012), and it progressively increased with increasing left ventricular filling pressure estimated by tissue Doppler imaging-derived E/E' (P<0.0001). After multivariate analysis, LGE remained significantly correlated with degree of diastolic dysfunction (P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Severity of myocardial fibrosis by LGE significantly correlates with the degree of diastolic dysfunction in a broad range of cardiac conditions. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of left ventricular diastolic function and therapeutic response.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Richard Müller-Brunotte; Thomas Kahan; Begoña López; Magnus Edner; Arantxa González; Javier Díez; Karin Malmqvist Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: James C C Moon; Emma Reed; Mary N Sheppard; Andrew G Elkington; Siew Yen Ho; Margaret Burke; Mario Petrou; Dudley J Pennell Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Youngsook Lee; Arlo N McGinn; Curtis D Olsen; Kihoon Nam; Minhyung Lee; Sug Kyun Shin; Sung Wan Kim Journal: J Control Release Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Richard J Mills; Drew M Titmarsh; Xaver Koenig; Benjamin L Parker; James G Ryall; Gregory A Quaife-Ryan; Holly K Voges; Mark P Hodson; Charles Ferguson; Lauren Drowley; Alleyn T Plowright; Elise J Needham; Qing-Dong Wang; Paul Gregorevic; Mei Xin; Walter G Thomas; Robert G Parton; Lars K Nielsen; Bradley S Launikonis; David E James; David A Elliott; Enzo R Porrello; James E Hudson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anna Palmisano; Francesco Giannini; Paola Rancoita; Guglielmo Gallone; Giulia Benedetti; Luca Baldetti; Georgios Tzanis; Davide Vignale; Caterina Monti; Francesco Ponticelli; Marco Ancona; Matteo Montorfano; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli; Antonio Colombo; Antonio Esposito Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 2.357