BACKGROUND: No large surgical series have qualitatively examined all histopathologic features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Medical records and microscopic slides were reviewed from 204 patients undergoing septal myectomy for HCM at Mayo Clinic Rochester. RESULTS: The 108 females and 96 males (1-86 years old; mean, 48) included 133 patients <60 years old (Group 1) and 71 patients > or =60 years (Group 2). Clinical features more prevalent in Group 2 than in Group 1 included female gender (68% vs. 45%; P=.003), aortic valve disease (31% vs. 12%; P=.01) and severe coronary atherosclerosis (43% vs. 9%; P=.001). Overall, microscopic abnormalities included myocyte hypertrophy (100%), endocardial (96%) and myocardial (93%) fibrosis, myocyte disarray (79%) and vacuolization (60%), endocardial inflammation (48%), arterial thickening (46%), dilated venules (28%), arterial dysplasia (16%), left bundle branch tissue (12%), infarction (2%), endocardial (1%) and myocardial (<1%) calcium, and amyloid (1%; senile type in all three). Lesions more prevalent in Group 1 than Group 2 were vacuolization (68% vs. 45%; P=.002), disarray (87% vs. 65%; P=.0003) and dilated venules (33% vs. 18%; P=.02). In contrast, lesions more frequent in Group 2 than in Group 1 included left bundle branch (20% vs. 8%; P=.02) and amyloid and endocardial calcium (4% vs. 0%; P=.04, each). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing septal myectomy for HCM, 53% were women and 35% were >/=60 years old. The most common microscopic features were hypertrophy, disarray, fibrosis, inflammation and vascular alterations. Disarray cannot be used as a morphologic hallmark for HCM in small surgical myectomy specimens because it was absent in 21% of the patients. Because amyloid unexpectedly affected three elderly patients, routine amyloid staining is recommended for patients >/=65 years old.
BACKGROUND: No large surgical series have qualitatively examined all histopathologic features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Medical records and microscopic slides were reviewed from 204 patients undergoing septal myectomy for HCM at Mayo Clinic Rochester. RESULTS: The 108 females and 96 males (1-86 years old; mean, 48) included 133 patients <60 years old (Group 1) and 71 patients > or =60 years (Group 2). Clinical features more prevalent in Group 2 than in Group 1 included female gender (68% vs. 45%; P=.003), aortic valve disease (31% vs. 12%; P=.01) and severe coronary atherosclerosis (43% vs. 9%; P=.001). Overall, microscopic abnormalities included myocyte hypertrophy (100%), endocardial (96%) and myocardial (93%) fibrosis, myocyte disarray (79%) and vacuolization (60%), endocardial inflammation (48%), arterial thickening (46%), dilated venules (28%), arterial dysplasia (16%), left bundle branch tissue (12%), infarction (2%), endocardial (1%) and myocardial (<1%) calcium, and amyloid (1%; senile type in all three). Lesions more prevalent in Group 1 than Group 2 were vacuolization (68% vs. 45%; P=.002), disarray (87% vs. 65%; P=.0003) and dilated venules (33% vs. 18%; P=.02). In contrast, lesions more frequent in Group 2 than in Group 1 included left bundle branch (20% vs. 8%; P=.02) and amyloid and endocardial calcium (4% vs. 0%; P=.04, each). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing septal myectomy for HCM, 53% were women and 35% were >/=60 years old. The most common microscopic features were hypertrophy, disarray, fibrosis, inflammation and vascular alterations. Disarray cannot be used as a morphologic hallmark for HCM in small surgical myectomy specimens because it was absent in 21% of the patients. Because amyloid unexpectedly affected three elderly patients, routine amyloid staining is recommended for patients >/=65 years old.
Authors: Paul Knaapen; Willem G van Dockum; Marco J W Götte; Kimiko A Broeze; Joost P A Kuijer; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; J Tim Marcus; Wouter E M Kok; Albert C van Rossum; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frans C Visser Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Lu Fang; Andris H Ellims; Anna L Beale; Andrew J Taylor; Andrew Murphy; Anthony M Dart Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Christopher T Sibley; Radwa A Noureldin; Neville Gai; Marcelo Souto Nacif; Songtao Liu; Evrim B Turkbey; James O Mudd; Rob J van der Geest; João A C Lima; Marc K Halushka; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marco Canepa; Iraklis Pozios; Pier Filippo Vianello; Pietro Ameri; Claudio Brunelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Theodore P Abraham Journal: Heart Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Christopher J McLeod; J Martijn Bos; Jeanne L Theis; William D Edwards; Bernard J Gersh; Steve R Ommen; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-10-03 Impact factor: 4.749