Literature DB >> 16592764

Average time until fixation of a mutant allele in a finite population under continued mutation pressure: Studies by analytical, numerical, and pseudo-sampling methods.

M Kimura1.   

Abstract

We consider a single locus, and denote by A the wild-type allele and by A' the mutant allele that is produced irreversibly in each generation from A at the rate v. Let 1 + s, 1 + h, and 1 be, respectively, the relative fitnesses of mutant homozygote A'A', mutant heterozygote A'A, and wild-type homozygote AA. Then, it is shown, on the basis of the diffusion equation method, that the average time until fixation of the mutant allele (A') in a randomly mating population of effective size N(e), given that the initial frequency is p, is [Formula: see text] in which B(x) = (S/2)x(2) + Hx(1 - x), S = 4N(e)s, H = 4N(e)h, and V = 4N(e)v. Of particular interest are the cases in which the mutant allele is deleterious (s = -s', s' > 0). Three cases are considered; the mutant is: (i) completely dominant s = h = -s', (ii) completely recessive s = -s', h = 0, and (iii) semidominant s = -s', h = -s'/2, in which s' is the selection coefficient against the mutant homozygote. It is shown that the average time until fixation is shorter when the deleterious mutant allele is dominant than when it is recessive if 4N(e)v is larger than 1. On the other hand, the situation is reversed if 4N(e)v is smaller than 1. It is also shown that for a mutant allele for which N(e)s' > 10, it takes such a long time until fixation that we can practically ignore the occurrence of random fixation of a deleterious allele under continued mutation pressure. To supplement the analytical treatment, extensive simulation experiments were performed by using a device called the pseudo-sampling variable, which can enormously accelerate the process of simulation by a computer. This method simulates the diffusion process itself rather than the binominal sampling process (in population genetics the diffusion model is usually regarded as an approximation of the discrete binomial sampling process).

Year:  1980        PMID: 16592764      PMCID: PMC348304          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.

Authors:  T MUKAI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Efficiency of truncation selection.

Authors:  J F Crow; M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Persistence of common alleles in two related populations or species.

Authors:  W H Li; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolutionary advantage of recombination.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet.

Authors:  J Haigh
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Minor viability mutants in Drosophila.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total
  32 in total

1.  Comparing relative rates of pollen and seed gene flow in the island model using nuclear and organelle measures of population structure.

Authors:  Matthew B Hamilton; Judith R Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Computer simulations: tools for population and evolutionary genetics.

Authors:  Sean Hoban; Giorgio Bertorelle; Oscar E Gaggiotti
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Support for the evolutionary speed hypothesis from intraspecific population genetic data in the non-biting midge Chironomus riparius.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Oppold; João A M Pedrosa; Miklós Bálint; João B Diogo; Julia Ilkova; João L T Pestana; Markus Pfenninger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Replication of an Egfr-wing shape association in a wild-caught cohort of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Arnar Palsson; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A novel solution for the time-dependent probability of gene fixation or loss under natural selection.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Bruce Rannala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genealogy of neutral genes and spreading of selected mutations in a geographically structured population.

Authors:  N Takahata
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Relationship between DNA polymorphism and fixation time.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  No Cost of Complexity in Bacteriophages Adapting to a Complex Environment.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Time for acquiring a new gene by duplication.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Drift load in populations of small size and low density.

Authors:  Y Willi; P Griffin; J Van Buskirk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.