Literature DB >> 15295349

Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability.

James L Whiteside1, Matthew D Barber, Marie F Paraiso, Cathy M Hugney, Mark D Walters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the clinical examination of anterior vaginal wall support defects. STUDY
DESIGN: Sixty-three patients with at least stage II anterior vaginal wall prolapse were prospectively evaluated with a standardized examination to detect anterior vaginal wall support defects. Interobserver reliability was assessed with a duplicate examination performed by a blinded second examiner. Intraobserver reliability was assessed with a second examination performed at least 3 weeks later by 1 of the original 2 examiners. Examination reliability for the 4 types of defects (central, right lateral, left lateral, and superior) was evaluated with the kappa statistic.
RESULTS: The inter- and intraexaminer reliability of the clinical examination for central, superior, and right and left paravaginal defects was poor; all kappas were less than 0.50. Overall interexaminer agreement was 42% with a kappa of 0.16 (95% CI, 0-0.32). Overall intraexaminer agreement was 46% with a kappa of 0.16 (95% CI, 0-0.45). Reliability was noted to improve with increasing stage of prolapse.
CONCLUSION: The clinical examination of anterior vaginal wall support defects displays poor interexaminer and intraexaminer agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295349     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Anterior and posterior compartment 3D endovaginal ultrasound anatomy based on direct histologic comparison.

Authors:  S Abbas Shobeiri; Dena White; Lieschen H Quiroz; Mikio A Nihira
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The now and the not yet of pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  James L Whiteside
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-09-22

3.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Posterior compartment anatomy as seen in magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction from asymptomatic nulliparas.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Clinical efficacy of a trocar-guided mesh kit for repairing lateral defects.

Authors:  Marion Ek; Daniel Altman; Jonas Gunnarsson; Christian Falconer; Gunilla Tegerstedt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support.

Authors:  Aimee Summers; Lisa A Winkel; Hero K Hussain; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Technique of anterior colporrhaphy: a Dutch evaluation.

Authors:  Ellen J M Lensen; Jackie A Stoutjesdijk; Mariella I J Withagen; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.