Literature DB >> 16556557

Short article one's own face is hard to ignore.

Serge Brédart1, Marie Delchambre, Steven Laureys.   

Abstract

One's own face possesses two properties that make it prone to grab attention: It is a face, and, in addition, it is a self-referential stimulus. The question of whether the self-face is actually an especially attention-grabbing stimulus was addressed by using a face-name interference paradigm. We investigated whether interference from a flanking self-face on the processing of a target classmate's name was stronger than interference from a classmate's flanking face on the processing of one's own name as the target. In a control condition a third familiar face served as the flanker for both decisions from the participant's own name and from the classmate's name. The presentation of the self-face as a flanker produced significantly more interference on the identification of a classmate's name than the presentation of that classmate's face did on the identification of one's own name. This result was due to the interfering power of the self-face and not to a particular resistance of one's name to interfering facial stimuli. We argue that the emotional value or the high familiarity of one's own face may explain its attention-grabbing property.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16556557     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500343678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  34 in total

1.  The cognitive advantage for one's own name is not simply familiarity: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Hongsheng Yang; Fang Wang; Nianjun Gu; Xiao Gao; Guang Zhao
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

2.  Can Salient Stimuli Enhance Responses in Disorders of Consciousness? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alfonso Magliacano; Francesco De Bellis; Alejandro Galvao-Carmona; Anna Estraneo; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Time is of the essence: past selves are not prioritized even when selective discrimination costs are controlled for.

Authors:  Julia Englert; Karola von Lampe; Nexhmedin Morina
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  Faces distort eye movement trajectories, but the distortion is not stronger for your own face.

Authors:  Haoyue Qian; Xiangping Gao; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Scanning strategies do not modulate face identification: eye-tracking and near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Yosuke Kita; Atsuko Gunji; Kotoe Sakihara; Masumi Inagaki; Makiko Kaga; Eiji Nakagawa; Toru Hosokawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Selective effects of cholinergic modulation on task performance during selective attention.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Pietro Pietrini; James V Haxby; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Divided attention selectively impairs memory for self-relevant information.

Authors:  David J Turk; Mirjam Brady-van den Bos; Philip Collard; Karri Gillespie-Smith; Martin A Conway; Sheila J Cunningham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

8.  Rule-based or information-integration category: processing of the self-face.

Authors:  Ronghua Zhang; Xiaofeng Ma; Aibao Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-09-13

9.  The n250 brain potential to personally familiar and newly learned faces and objects.

Authors:  Lara J Pierce; Lisa S Scott; Sophie Boddington; Danielle Droucker; Tim Curran; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Modulation of self-esteem in self- and other-evaluations primed by subliminal and supraliminal faces.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Shen Zhang; Qi Li; Haiyan Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.