Literature DB >> 31520169

Rule-based or information-integration category: processing of the self-face.

Ronghua Zhang1, Xiaofeng Ma1, Aibao Zhou2.   

Abstract

This study investigated the differences between categorizing the self-face and other faces. Additionally, the study aimed to determine whether self-face categorization is consistent with dual-system categorization, such as in the competition between verbal and implicit systems (COVIS) model, or whether the self-face uses different categorizing methods than those used with other faces. The experiment adopted a dual-task paradigm to examine how participants complete rule-based/information-integration categorization tasks of the self-face/other faces and their method of processing when a numerical Stroop task was introduced. Results indicated that participants processed the self-face better than other faces in rule-based categorization, and there was no significant difference between categorization of the self-face and other faces during a single or dual task. This suggests there is a self-processing advantage in classification tasks; however, categorization based on face stimuli is not consistent with the COVIS model. Face categorization has a self-advantage effect, and categorization of human faces is distinctive from other types of categorization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Competition between verbal and implicit systems; Dual-task paradigm; Face recognition

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520169     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00932-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  17 in total

1.  Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task.

Authors:  J P Keenan; B McCutcheon; S Freund; G G Gallup; G Sanders; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Single-system models and interference in category learning: commentary on Waldron and Ashby (2001).

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; John K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

3.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Disrupting feedback processing interferes with rule-based but not information-integration category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby; A David Ing; Alan D Pickering
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

5.  Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.

Authors:  Helen Keyes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; R P Woods; M Iacoboni; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Human category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Holistic processing predicts face recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03-10

9.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Markus Kiefer; Cindy M Bukach
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-08

10.  Importance of the inverted control in measuring holistic face processing with the composite effect and part-whole effect.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Anne Aimola Davies; Hayley Darke; Kate Crookes; Tushara Wickramariyaratne; Stephanie Zappia; Chiara Fiorentini; Simone Favelle; Mary Broughton; Dinusha Fernando
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.