Alfonso Magliacano1, Francesco De Bellis2,3, Alejandro Galvao-Carmona4, Anna Estraneo5, Luigi Trojano2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy. alfonso.magliacano@unicampania.it. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy. 3. IRCCS Fondazione don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Sant'Angelo dei Lombardi, Avellino, Italy. 4. Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain. 5. IRCCS Fondazione don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Florence, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diagnostic classification of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is based on clinician's observation of volitional behaviours. However, patients' caregivers often report higher levels of responsiveness with respect to those observed during the clinical assessment. Thus, increasing efforts have been aimed at comprehending the effects of self-referential and emotional stimuli on patients' responsiveness. Here we systematically reviewed the original experimental studies that compared behavioural and electrophysiological responses with salient vs. neutral material in patients in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or in minimally conscious state. RECENT FINDINGS: Most of the reviewed studies showed that salient stimuli (i.e. patient's own or familiar faces, patient's own name, and familiar voices) seem to elicit a higher amount of behavioural or electrophysiological responses with respect to neutral pictures or sounds. Importantly, a quite high percentage of patients seem to respond to salient stimuli only. The present review could foster use of personally salient stimuli in assessing DoC. However, the low overall quality of evidence and some limitations in the general reviewing process might induce caution in transferring these suggestions into clinical practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diagnostic classification of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is based on clinician's observation of volitional behaviours. However, patients' caregivers often report higher levels of responsiveness with respect to those observed during the clinical assessment. Thus, increasing efforts have been aimed at comprehending the effects of self-referential and emotional stimuli on patients' responsiveness. Here we systematically reviewed the original experimental studies that compared behavioural and electrophysiological responses with salient vs. neutral material in patients in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or in minimally conscious state. RECENT FINDINGS: Most of the reviewed studies showed that salient stimuli (i.e. patient's own or familiar faces, patient's own name, and familiar voices) seem to elicit a higher amount of behavioural or electrophysiological responses with respect to neutral pictures or sounds. Importantly, a quite high percentage of patients seem to respond to salient stimuli only. The present review could foster use of personally salient stimuli in assessing DoC. However, the low overall quality of evidence and some limitations in the general reviewing process might induce caution in transferring these suggestions into clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical evaluation; Disorders of consciousness; Minimally conscious state; Saliency-self-related stimuli; Vegetative state
Authors: Christopher R Nicholas; Donald G McLaren; Michael J Gawrysiak; Baxter P Rogers; John H Dougherty; Michael R Nash Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Steven Laureys; Gastone G Celesia; Francois Cohadon; Jan Lavrijsen; José León-Carrión; Walter G Sannita; Leon Sazbon; Erich Schmutzhard; Klaus R von Wild; Adam Zeman; Giuliano Dolce Journal: BMC Med Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: S Laureys; F Perrin; M-E Faymonville; C Schnakers; M Boly; V Bartsch; S Majerus; G Moonen; P Maquet Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-09-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Berno U H Overbeek; Jan C M Lavrijsen; Simon van Gaal; Daniel Kondziella; Henk J Eilander; Raymond T C M Koopmans Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Melanie Boltzmann; Simone B Schmidt; Christoph Gutenbrunner; Joachim K Krauss; Martin Stangel; Günter U Höglinger; Claus-W Wallesch; Thomas F Münte; Jens D Rollnik Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.677