Literature DB >> 16555779

Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women.

M J Law Smith1, D I Perrett, B C Jones, R E Cornwell, F R Moore, D R Feinberg, L G Boothroyd, S J Durrani, M R Stirrat, S Whiten, R M Pitman, S G Hillier.   

Abstract

Although many accounts of facial attractiveness propose that femininity in women's faces indicates high levels of oestrogen, there is little empirical evidence in support of this assumption. Here, we used assays for urinary metabolites of oestrogen (oestrone-3-glucuronide, E1G) and progesterone (pregnanediol-3-glucuronide, P3G) to investigate the relationship between circulating gonadal hormones and ratings of the femininity, attractiveness and apparent health of women's faces. Positive correlations were observed between late follicular oestrogen and ratings of femininity, attractiveness and health. Positive correlations of luteal progesterone and health and attractiveness ratings were marginally significant. Ratings of facial attributions did not relate to hormone levels for women wearing make-up when photographed. There was no effect of sex of rater on the relationships between oestrogen and ratings of facial appearance. These findings demonstrate that female facial appearance holds detectable cues to reproductive health that are considered attractive by other people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16555779      PMCID: PMC1560017          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Preimplantation hormonal differences between the conception and non-conception menstrual cycles of 32 normal women.

Authors:  D D Baird; A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg; F Kamel; D R McConnaughey; P I Musey; D C Collins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars.

Authors:  P J Benson; D I Perrett
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?

Authors:  G Rhodes; C Hickford; L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-02

5.  Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlicek; Jaroslav Flegr; Martina Hruskova; Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett; Marion Petrie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles.

Authors:  S F Lipson; P T Ellison
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Body shape and women's attractiveness : The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  D Singh
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

8.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K A May; S Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women.

Authors:  Grazyna Jasieńska; Anna Ziomkiewicz; Peter T Ellison; Susan F Lipson; Inger Thune
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Hormonal patterns in infertile women with a deficient postcoital test.

Authors:  F J Roumen; W H Doesburg; R Rolland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  54 in total

1.  Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics.

Authors:  R Elisabeth Cornwell; Miriam J Law Smith; Lynda G Boothroyd; Fhionna R Moore; Hasker P Davis; Michael Stirrat; Bernard Tiddeman; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolving attractive faces using morphing technology and a genetic algorithm: a new approach to determining ideal facial aesthetics.

Authors:  Brian J F Wong; Koohyar Karimi; Zlatko Devcic; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Familiarity affects the assessment of female facial signals of fertility by free-ranging male rhesus macaques.

Authors:  James P Higham; Kelly D Hughes; Lauren J N Brent; Constance Dubuc; Antje Engelhardt; Michael Heistermann; Dario Maestriperi; Laurie R Santos; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

7.  Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women.

Authors:  Kristina M Durante; Norman P Li
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Human's cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: a study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Eduardo A Undurraga; Dan T A Eisenberg; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; Ruoxue Wang; William R Leonard; Thomas W McDade; Victoria Reyes-García; Colleen Nyberg; Susan Tanner; Tomás Huanca; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) prefer symmetrical face shapes?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; Lauren J Wooddell; Carmen E Lefevre; Eric Lonsdorf; Elizabeth Lonsdorf
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Why some women look young for their age.

Authors:  David A Gunn; Helle Rexbye; Christopher E M Griffiths; Peter G Murray; Amelia Fereday; Sharon D Catt; Cyrena C Tomlin; Barbara H Strongitharm; Dave I Perrett; Michael Catt; Andrew E Mayes; Andrew G Messenger; Martin R Green; Frans van der Ouderaa; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.