Literature DB >> 16555259

Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths.

Vasily L Yarnykh1, Masahiro Terashima, Cecil E Hayes, Ann Shimakawa, Norihide Takaya, Patricia K Nguyen, Jean H Brittain, Michael V McConnell, Chun Yuan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare black-blood multicontrast carotid imaging at 3T and 1.5T and assess compatibility between morphological measurements of carotid arteries at 1.5T and 3T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five healthy subjects and two atherosclerosis patients were scanned in 1.5T and 3T scanners with a similar protocol providing transverse T1-, T2-, and proton density (PD)-weighted black-blood images using a fast spin-echo sequence with single- (T1-weighted) or multislice (PD-/T2-weighted) double inversion recovery (DIR) preparation. Wall and lumen signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and wall/lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared in 44 artery cross-sections by paired t-test. Interscanner variability of the lumen area (LA), wall area (WA), and mean wall thickness (MWT) was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: Wall SNR and lumen/wall CNR significantly increased (P < 0.0001) at 3T with a 1.5-fold gain for T1-weighted images and a 1.7/1.8-fold gain for PD-/T2-weighted images. Lumen SNR did not differ for single-slice DIR T1-weighted images (P = 0.2), but was larger at 3T for multislice DIR PD-/T2-weighted images (P = 0.01/0.03). The LA, WA, and MWT demonstrated good agreement with no significant bias (P 0.5), a coefficient of variation (CV) of < 10%, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of > 0.95.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant improvement in SNR, CNR, and image quality for high- resolution black-blood imaging of carotid arteries at 3T. Morphologic measurements are compatible between 1.5T and 3T. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16555259     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  42 in total

1.  The ability to identify the intraparotid facial nerve for locating parotid gland lesions in comparison to other indirect landmark methods: evaluation by 3.0 T MR imaging with surface coils.

Authors:  Mana Ishibashi; Shinya Fujii; Katsuyuki Kawamoto; Keisuke Nishihara; Eiji Matsusue; Kazuhiko Kodani; Toshio Kaminou; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Variability of carotid artery measurements on 3-Tesla MRI and its impact on sample size calculation for clinical research.

Authors:  Mushabbar A Syed; John N Oshinski; Charles Kitchen; Arshad Ali; Richard J Charnigo; Arshed A Quyyumi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Carotid intima-media thickness and distensibility measured by MRI at 3 T versus high-resolution ultrasound.

Authors:  Andreas Harloff; Timo Zech; Alex Frydrychowicz; Martin Schumacher; Joachim Schöllhorn; Jürgen Hennig; Cornelius Weiller; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Increasing spatial resolution of 3T MRI scanning improves reproducibility of carotid arterial wall dimension measurements.

Authors:  Diederik F van Wijk; Aart C Strang; Raphael Duivenvoorden; Dirk-Jan F Enklaar; Rob J van der Geest; John J P Kastelein; Eric de Groot; Erik S G Stroes; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Image-guided radio-frequency gain calibration for high-field MRI.

Authors:  Elodie Breton; Kellyanne McGorty; Graham C Wiggins; Leon Axel; Daniel Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Comparison between 2D and 3D high-resolution black-blood techniques for carotid artery wall imaging in clinically significant atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Niranjan Balu; Baocheng Chu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Vasily L Yarnykh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Magnetic [corrected] resonance imaging [corrected] features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque.

Authors:  Baocheng Chu; Marina S Ferguson; Huijun Chen; Daniel S Hippe; William S Kerwin; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

Review 8.  Three-Dimensional Carotid Plaque MR Imaging.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Atherosclerosis is Evident in Treated HIV-Infected Subjects With Low Cardiovascular Risk by Carotid Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Kathleen A M Rose; Jaime H Vera; Peter Drivas; Winston Banya; Niall Keenan; Dudley J Pennell; Alan Winston
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Signal features of the atherosclerotic plaque at 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla: impact on automatic classification.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Fei Liu; Vasily Yarnykh; Hunter Underhill; Minako Oikawa; Wei Yu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.